Analysis Question-differentiabillity, continuity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
JohnnyBG00d
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Analysis Question--differentiabillity, continuity

Homework Statement


Suppose [itex]f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}[/itex] is a [itex]C^\infty[/itex] function which satisfies the equation [itex]f''(x)=-x^2f(x)[/itex] along with [itex]f(0)=1[/itex], [itex]f'(0)=0[/itex]. Prove that there is an [itex]a>0[/itex] such that [itex]f(a)=0[/itex]. Do not use any results from differential equations. Thank you.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Since f is continuously differentiable there is a [itex](0,\delta)[/itex] interval in which f is concave down. If we can show f is also decreasing then it follows that f must cross the x-axis before changing concavity and increasing because there can be no cusps as f is differentiable everywhere. I have no idea if that is the right track. Thank you.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


JohnnyBG00d said:
If we can show f is also decreasing then it follows that f must cross the x-axis before changing concavity and increasing

Not true. A counterexample sin(x)+2 goes between convex and concave without crossing x.

JohnnyBG00d said:
I have no idea if that is the right track. Thank you.
Perhaps it'd be easier to prove by contradiction.
f(0)=1>0, by continuity, in the immediate neighborhood xE[0,c], f(x)>0. Let's (erroneously) assume f(x)>0 for all x>0. since f''(x)<0, f(x) concave down, it follows that
f(x)<f(c)+f'(c)(x-c) for all x>0 and c>0
You can prove f'(x)<0 for all x>0 (if the assumption is true), hence f'(x)=-|f'(x)|.

Now, let x=ζ=c+f(c)/|f'(c)|, it leads to
f(ζ)<0 where ζ>c>0. Now this contradicts with the assumption that f(x)>0 for all x>0.

Not pretty, just to bounce some idea.
 
Last edited: