Analyzing a Pulley System: Solving for Energy and Work

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing a pulley system involving two blocks with masses of 50 kg and 100 kg. The key equations used include the work-energy principle, potential energy (PE = mgh), and kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv²). A critical error identified was the incorrect mass used in the potential energy calculation for Block A, which should be 50 kg instead of 100 kg. The participants suggest using force balances as an alternative method to verify the results obtained from energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle
  • Familiarity with potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of forces and friction in physics
  • Ability to perform trigonometric calculations involving angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about force balance methods in mechanics
  • Study the effects of friction on kinetic energy in pulley systems
  • Explore advanced applications of the work-energy principle
  • Investigate the role of trigonometry in physics problems involving angles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy systems, as well as educators looking for examples of problem-solving in pulley systems.

minimario
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


AjbiTtv.png


Homework Equations


## W_{nc} = \Delta KE + \Delta PE ##
## PE = mgh ##
## KE = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 ##

The Attempt at a Solution


For Block B, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 100 v^2 + (-20)(g)(100) ##

For Block A, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 50 v^2 + (20 \sin 37^{\circ})(g)(100) ##

Therefore, we have the total change in energy is ## 75 v^2 - 13702 ##. This is the total work done by nonconservative forces.

The only nonconservative force is friction on the A block. The normal force on the A block is ## 50g \cos 37^{\circ} ##, so the friction force is ## (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) ## The work done by friction is then ## - 20 \cdot (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) = 1956.66 ##, so ## 75v^2-13702 = 1956.66 \Rightarrow v^2 = 208.77 ##, so the Kinetic Energy change is ## \frac{1}{2} (50)(208.77) = 5219.25 ##

This is incorrect, can anyone find what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
 
I suggest a simpler approach: determine the net force; from that and from the masses involved, find the acceleration, and you have solved a half of the problem...
 
Chestermiller said:
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
That was a typo.
 
There should be a sin 37 in the potential energy term of block B also.

Chet
 
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
 
minimario said:
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
No, they don't cancel out. Don't forget your typo on the masses.

Chet
 
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
 
minimario said:
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
Shouldn't the friction decrease the kinetic energy?

Chet
 
  • #10
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
 
  • #11
minimario said:
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
If there were no friction, the velocity of the blocks would be higher.

Chet
 
  • #12
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
 
  • #13
minimario said:
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
What I mean is that you have the wrong sign on the friction term.

One way to be sure is to solve the problem using force balances rather than the energy balance. At the very least, you should check to see that they both give the same answer.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
862
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K