Analyzing Force Members and Trusses: Calculating Equilibrium and Moments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing force members and trusses, specifically focusing on calculating equilibrium and moments in a structural mechanics context. Participants are addressing a homework problem that involves determining axial forces in truss members and applying equilibrium equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the angle of a force at point D and its impact on calculating perpendicular distances.
  • Another suggests using geometry to find the lengths of members and applying the method of joints to determine forces in the members.
  • A participant notes the importance of drawing to scale and emphasizes that the problems depend more on angles than on distances, highlighting the significance of ratios.
  • A tutor offers a structured approach to solving the problem, recommending the establishment of a global coordinate system and an internal force convention, while also noting the structure's indeterminacy by one degree.
  • One participant interprets a force as a vertical link, suggesting that this makes the structure statically determinate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on how to approach the problem, with no consensus reached on the best method or interpretation of the structure's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the geometry of the truss and the implications of indeterminacy, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and educators in applied mechanics, structural engineering, and those interested in learning about truss analysis and equilibrium calculations.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See Figure

Homework Equations



[tex]\sum F_{x} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\sum F_{y} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\sum M = 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



See Figure

I'm fairly certain the force I drew at point D isn't at a 90 degree angle, but if its not I can't find the perpendicular distance for the horizontal/vertical distances at the point D.

This has been giving me a really big headache and a lot of stress lately so some help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • TrussQ1.JPG
    TrussQ1.JPG
    11.5 KB · Views: 526
  • TrussQ1Attempt.JPG
    TrussQ1Attempt.JPG
    36.8 KB · Views: 527
Physics news on Phys.org
* Use geometery to find length of members
* Then using method of joints, forces in the members can be easily found.
 
Last edited:
I see you are using squared paper, but not drawing everything to scale. To do so would help you check the use of 3-4-5 triangles. Interestingly, these problems do not really depend on distances but on angles. If the units were km, the answer would be the same. This emphasises that the ratios of distances are the key to full understanding.
 
Hey mate,

I am an applied mechanics tutor so I should be able to see you finish this problem under guidance. You are told to find the axial forces running through these members.

Step 1. Pick a set a global x-y coordinates to work with. This may be anywhere on the structure but for convenience I recommend doing so on the node A.

Step 2. Have yourself an internal force convention. This should be somewhere in your notes. i.e. tension positive, compression negative etc.

Step 3. Use the equilibrium equations you stated to find the reactions.

We now run into a problem here. You have two fixed supports. This structure is indeterminate by one degree. If indeterminate structures is what you are here for please reply back and confirm this so I may continue.

I have assumed you are new to solving statically determinate structures. Correct me if I am wrong.
 
I understood FH to be a vertical link, so that F behaves like a roller support. That makes it stat det.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K