And here i always thought reader's digest was a respectable magazine

  • Thread starter Thread starter halfdyke
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the August issue of Reader's Digest, which features a cover story claiming "new evidence: life after death." Participants express skepticism about the magazine's credibility, with one user finding the headline amusing and dismissive of its claims. The conversation touches on broader themes of consciousness and the possibility of existence beyond death, suggesting that current technology may not fully understand these concepts. Users also critique the magazine's history of sensational reporting, recalling past articles that presented extreme views or misinformation, such as the portrayal of marijuana and AIDS. Overall, the thread highlights a mix of humor, skepticism, and curiosity about the topic of life after death and the reliability of popular media.
halfdyke
in the august issue of reader's digest, the headline on the cover: "new evidence: life after death". comments folks? i think it's hilarious, not to mention hogwash, but of course i'll read the article and get back to you with what it says is the "evidence".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I think of life after death, I'm not thinking of god, my grandparents and a big white light. I'm thinking that there are still many things in the universe that we do not fully understand. And it may be possible that our "consciousness" is transferred to an alternative form of existence-some type of matter/energy conversion. Maybe into an alternate dimensional plane- who knows? There may be things our current technology can't detect.

But hey, if dead is dead- I can accept that without pause.
 
Originally posted by halfdyke
in the august issue of reader's digest, the headline on the cover: "new evidence: life after death". comments folks? i think it's hilarious, not to mention hogwash, but of course i'll read the article and get back to you with what it says is the "evidence".

IMO, the perceived credibility of the bathroom bible has always been a lie. I don't know how it ever got the reputation that it enjoys. Of course, this time it could be true…. :wink:

I remember a lecture that I got from mom when I was about 16. She showed me a RD that explained how smoking pot will make you a rapist. She wanted to make sure I didn't smoke pot and become a rapist also.

I also read in RD that a black hole passed through the Earth in 1908. This is what caused the Tunguska explosion. In the early 90s I read that aids [portrayed as the gay plague] would have killed us all by now. I have read much hogwash as such from RD. There has been one on the toilet my entire life - mom then wife...this is at least an appropriate forum for the magazine.
 
Smoking pot definitely doesn't make you a rapist. It may make you lazy, unmotivated, and hungry- but a rapist- nope
 
Originally posted by Zantra
Smoking pot definitely doesn't make you a rapist. It may make you lazy, unmotivated, and hungry- but a rapist- nope

Oh yes I didn't mean to put that twist on things. I was pointing to the indefensible extremes in their reporting. The last time that I checked, we are not all dead from aids either.
 
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
Oh yes I didn't mean to put that twist on things. I was pointing to the indefensible extremes in their reporting. The last time that I checked, we are not all dead from aids either.

2 words man- "positive reinforncement"
 
Originally posted by Zantra
2 words man- "positive reinforncement"


When I read your objection to my post I couldn’t answer fast enough.
 
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
When I read your objection to my post I couldn’t answer fast enough.

Just wanted to point that fact out to the masses :wink:
 
Back
Top