Angle of rarefraction in a pool

  • Thread starter Thread starter famematt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the angle of refraction for an observer viewing a coin at the bottom of a swimming pool. The observer's height is 1.50 m above the water, and the distance to the coin is 2 m. The refractive index of the water is 1.35. The correct formula to determine the angle of refraction is 90 - tan-1(1.5/2), confirming that the distance of 2 m is measured to the normal at the water's surface, not directly to the coin. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the reference point for the distance measurement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law and refraction principles
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically tangent and arctangent
  • Familiarity with the concept of refractive indices
  • Basic geometry related to angles and distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Snell's Law and its applications in optics
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric functions in real-world scenarios
  • Explore the concept of refractive indices in different mediums
  • Practice problems involving angles of refraction and incidence
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, particularly those focusing on optics and refraction, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to light behavior in different mediums.

famematt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am doing a practice exam for i have exams coming up soon. The problem is as follows :)

Homework Statement


An observer standing on the edge of the pool views a coin on the bottom of a swimming pool.

The observers eyes are 1.50 m above the pool and she sees the coin by looking at a point from 2m from where she is standing.

The refractive index of the pool water relative to air is 1.35 and the pool is 1.50 m deep.

(1) Find the angle of rarefaction.
(a diagram is attached)

Homework Equations



Well, basically, the answer sheet says that the angle is 90 - tan-1(1.5/2)

But the 2m is the distance is from the person to the coin, not the person to the normal, is it not?

Can someone confirm to me that I am either understanding the question incorrectly or the answer in the book is wrong?

Thanks,
Matt
 

Attachments

  • Untitled1.png
    Untitled1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,
The two meters would indeed be to the normal. Remember, the observer is actually looking at the surface of the water where the light refracts, and hence is at the normal location.
 
Yes, but is the answer to the question wrong?
Im unsure...

It was 90-(tan-1(1.5/2))...

I THINK its wrong... I am just unsure :)
 
My initial statement was pertaining to your diagram. However, I am getting
arctan(1.5/2) as an answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K