Angular acceleration of a cylinder?

Click For Summary
To find the angular acceleration of a rolling cylinder on an inclined plane, the relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration is crucial, expressed as α = a/r, where α is angular acceleration, a is linear acceleration, and r is the radius. The moment of inertia for a cylinder rotating about its length is indeed 1/2 mr², which is important for torque calculations. The discussion emphasizes that angular acceleration can be expressed in rad/s², and there is no need to convert it using 2π. The calculations indicate that a smaller radius results in a higher angular acceleration for the same linear acceleration. Overall, understanding these relationships is essential for solving the problem accurately.
khfrekek92
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



After some long calculations, I found that the linear acceleration of a cylinder on an inclined plane (attached to a block over a pulley on another inclined plane) was 8.76238 m/s^2. How do I find the angular acceleration of this rolling cylinder?


Homework Equations



I[omega]=mR^2[omega] maybe?

The Attempt at a Solution



I literally have no idea how to finish this problem.. Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the cylinder is rolling without slipping, then the angular acceleration is equal to the linear acceleration divided by the radius of the cylinder.

cheers
 
khfrekek92 said:

Homework Equations



I[omega]=mR^2[omega] maybe?

Isn't the moment of inertia for a cylinder rotating around ax axis through its length 1/2 mr2 (or am I misremembering?). If so the equation you suggest cannot be correct.

You might make use of
a= r \alpha
where a is the tangential acceleration of a point on the circumference. Do you have the information to find that? Perhaps from the distance and time, if there is no slipping?

How about \tau=I\alpha and \tau=rF?
 
Fewmet said:
Isn't the moment of inertia for a cylinder rotating around ax axis through its length 1/2 mr2 (or am I misremembering?). If so the equation you suggest cannot be correct.

You might make use of
a= r \alpha
where a is the tangential acceleration of a point on the circumference. Do you have the information to find that? Perhaps from the distance and time, if there is no slipping?

How about \tau=I\alpha and \tau=rF?

Are you planning to find torque then angelar acceleration? ... that is surely not a good method
a = \alpha r is perfectly correct

its just a derived eqn from s = \theta r ... here s is linear displacement ...
 
Okay so if [alpha]=a/r, I plug everything in and with r=.2m and a=5.00156 m/s^2, I get [alpha]=25.0078 s^-2. Inverse squared seconds? Is that a unit of angular acceleration? How would I get that into rad/sec^2? Just multiply it by 2[pi]? I think these angular accelerations are too high for a 5m/s^2 acceleration?
 
no need to multiply be 2 pi
rad is not a dimensional unit
it is for pure numbers

angular acceleration is 25 rad/s^-2

and for your question that this looks too large for 5m/s^2 acceleration ...

consider 2 cylinders ... one of very smaller radius than other
in order to move together ... smaller one has to spin much more quickly
so even though their linear acceleration may be same ... due to small size ... smaller one will have much larger angular acceleration
 
Oh okay awesome! Thank you so so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
919
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K