Angular Acceleration of A Rigid Rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rigid rod rotating in a vertical plane about a pivot, with attached masses at its ends. The goal is to determine the angular acceleration of the system at a specific angle with respect to the horizontal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the moment of inertia and torque, with attempts to apply the relevant equations. There are questions about the correct setup for torque calculations and the role of angle θ in these calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the calculations for moment of inertia and torque. Some guidance has been offered regarding the torque calculation and the importance of considering the direction of torques, although there is no explicit consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the configuration of the masses on the rod and how this affects the torque calculations. The problem does not specify the positions of the masses or the orientation of the rod, leading to varied interpretations among participants.

tzacher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rigid rod of mass 3.50 kg and length of 2.70 m rotates in a vertical (x,y) plane about a frictionless pivot through its center. Particles m1 (mass=4.70 kg) and m2 (mass=2.60 kg) are attached at the ends of the rod. Determine the size of the angular acceleration of the system when the rod makes an angle of 46.1o with the horizontal.


Homework Equations


I = (1/12)ML^2 + MR^2 + MR^2
τ = Iα

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried using the moment of inertia to find the I of the rod and each mass, then tried plugging that into the torque equation, but I can't seem to figure out what the torque equation is supposed to be. I tried to have τ=m1gL1sinθ-m2gL2sinθ, but that didn't work out. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could spell out more of your calculation details. Also, verify the location of the angle θ in the triangles you've constructed for the torque calculations.
 
Alright so for moment of inertia, I had:

I = (1/12)(3.5)(2.7)^2 + 4.7(.675)^2 + 2.6(.675)^2

And then my torque was:

T = (.675)(9.81)(4.7)sin(46.1) + (.675)(9.81)(4.7)sin(46.1)

I'm not quite sure about the torque calculation being correct.
 
tzacher said:
Alright so for moment of inertia, I had:

I = (1/12)(3.5)(2.7)^2 + 4.7(.675)^2 + 2.6(.675)^2

And then my torque was:

T = (.675)(9.81)(4.7)sin(46.1) + (.675)(9.81)(4.7)sin(46.1)

I'm not quite sure about the torque calculation being correct.

Yes, there's a bit of a problem with your torque calculation. Here's a diagram of the situation

attachment.php?attachmentid=40330&stc=1&d=1319593311.gif


Well, it's one of the possible situations; The problem doesn't specify which mass is on which end of the rod or which one is elevated above the pivot, or even on which side of the pivot the rod is elevated! So I suppose that you can assume they want the magnitude of the acceleration without specifying its direction.

Note where the angle θ appears in the force triangles relating the weights of the masses and the components perpendicular to rod. What trig function is applicable to find that component? Note also the directions that the torques have with respect to each other. Do they aid or oppose each other?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.1 KB · Views: 681
I don't think the direction matters, it rarely does.

So how would I find the torque? They're both going downwards, but I know that the larger mass is going to exert more of a torque. So would that make the torque:

T = r*m1g*cos(θ) - r*m2g*cos(θ)
 
Yes, that looks better. Take the absolute value of the difference to indicate that direction is being ignored.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K