Angular frequency of electron in an electric field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electron oscillating in the electrostatic field of a charged ring. The original poster attempts to derive the angular frequency of oscillation and explores the relationship between the electric field and the forces acting on the electron.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the angular frequency and the implications of the electric field on the electron's motion. There are attempts to apply calculus and equations of motion, with some questioning the validity of simple harmonic motion assumptions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding binomial expansion and conditions for small oscillations. Others are exploring alternative scenarios, such as replacing the electron with a spherical charged body, and discussing the implications of larger distances on the motion's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the limitations of approximations when the distance from the center of the ring is not small compared to the ring's radius. Participants express uncertainty about the behavior of different charge configurations and the resulting motion.

amind
Messages
36
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


An electron is constrained to the central axis of the ring of charge of radius R , Show that the electrostatic force exerted on the electron can cause it to oscillate through the center of the ring with an angular frequency

ω = \sqrt{\frac{eq}{4π\epsilon_{0}mR^{3}}}

where q is the ring's charge and m is electron's mass.

Homework Equations



Electric field at the axis due to a ring of charge q,
E = \frac{qz}{4π\epsilon_{0}(z^{2}+R^{2})^{3/2}}

where is the distance from the center of the ring

The Attempt at a Solution



Given E, F = qE
\Rightarrow a = F/m
This isn't simply SHM so
ω ≠ \sqrt{k/m}
So that wouldn't work
Then I thought if i could find x(t) , I could easily find the time period
So, x(t) = x(t+T)
But a(x) = \frac{eqz}{4πm\epsilon_{0}(z^{2}+R^{2})^{3/2}}
I couldn't derive anything using the equations of motion , or simple calculus.
So I need some help, not the whole solution but possibly some hints or pointers...
Help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
amind said:
But a(x) = \frac{eqz}{4πm\epsilon_{0}(z^{2}+R^{2})^{3/2}}

Take out R from the denominator . Then binomially expand the expression.The condition for small oscillation is z<<R .
 
Last edited:
Hint: it's a very low order expansion ...
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Take out R from the denominator . Then binomially expand the expression.The condition for small oscillation is z<<R .


Oh ! I just didn't see that , thank you.
But what if instead of the electron we take a spherical charged body and where z is not very small
 
amind said:
But what if instead of the electron we take a spherical charged body

I do not know .May be rude man has the answer .

But if I have to make a guess ,then if the spherical body is uniformly charged ,then we may replace it with a point like particle of equivalent charge.

amind said:
and where z is not very small

Well ,then you will not be able to apply the approximation and the motion will not be simple harmonic.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
I do not know .May be rude man has the answer .

But if I have to make a guess ,then if the spherical body is uniformly charged ,then we may replace it with a point like particle of equivalent charge.

Well ,then you will not be able to apply the approximation and the motion will not be simple harmonic.

I wouldn't want to tackle the case of a finite-size sphere. I wonder about polarization effects, i.e. asymmetric surface charges since the E field is not uniform over the sphere.

And right, if it's still a point mass but z is not << R then you wind up with a nonlinear diff. eq. which again I would not want to tackle.
 
@Tanya and @rude man
I said spherical charged body , so that unlike an electron it is not very small (point size) , okay instead now consider a point charge with charge q' and z is not very small , now what.

I am thinking of making a c++ simulation with unit constants for having a better idea to see what answer it might give
 
amind said:
@Tanya and @rude man
I said spherical charged body , so that unlike an electron it is not very small (point size) , okay instead now consider a point charge with charge q' and z is not very small , now what.

I am thinking of making a c++ simulation with unit constants for having a better idea to see what answer it might give

As tanya and I said, with a point charge but z not << R you get a nonlinear differential equation which is very difficult to solve in closed form. But you will still get oscillations, only they aren't SHM and the z(t) waveform vs. t will look like a horrible distorted sine wave. This is somewhat like a simple pendulum oscillating with a large angle, say pi/4.

Go ahead and simulate - that is a great idea! Use various z/R, starting with z << R and building up.
 
Okay , thanks for your time and help , :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
765
Replies
12
Views
3K