Angular Momentum Conservation for Projectile-Rod Collision | Homework Solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a projectile colliding with a stationary rod, focusing on the conservation of angular momentum to find the angular speed of the system post-collision. The context includes concepts from dynamics and rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of angular momentum and energy perspectives, questioning the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy.
  • Some participants explore the conversion of energy types and the implications of inelastic collisions on kinetic energy conservation.
  • There are attempts to clarify the moment of inertia calculations and the application of the parallel axis theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the correct approach to calculating moment of inertia and addressing misconceptions about energy conservation in inelastic collisions. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating constraints related to the distribution of mass in the rod and the assumptions about the projectile's moment of inertia. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of formulas and understanding the physical principles involved.

jdboucher
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile of mass m = 1.49 kg moves to
the right with speed v0 = 19.6 m/s. The pro-
jectile strikes and sticks to the end of a sta-
tionary rod of mass M = 6.55 kg and length
d = 2.29 m that is pivoted about a frictionless
axle through its center.
Find the angular speed of the system right
after the collision.
Answer in units of rad/s.


Homework Equations



Icom rod = (1/12)ML^2

3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b

I figured I would use conservation of angular momentum to determine the final angular speed. I'm unsure how to find the initial angular momentum. I can find the final moment of inertia.

(1/12)(1.49 + 6.55)(2.29)^2 = 3.51

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think viewing it from an energy perspective will be easier.
 
Winzer said:
I think viewing it from an energy perspective will be easier.

Does translational (i think that's what its called) kinetic energy relate to rotational kinetic energy?
 
jdboucher said:
Does translational (i think that's what its called) kinetic energy relate to rotational kinetic energy?
What happens in the problem? The energy gets converted from ____ to _____.
It comes from the conversion of motion. From Linear to Rotational right?
 
Winzer said:
What happens in the problem? The energy gets converted from ____ to _____.
It comes from the conversion of motion. From Linear to Rotational right?

Is it kinetic to potential?
 
Winzer said:
What happens in the problem? The energy gets converted from ____ to _____.
It comes from the conversion of motion. From Linear to Rotational right?

so can I do this:

0.5mv^2 = Iw
 
jdboucher said:
Is it kinetic to potential?
I was looking for the energy gets converted from linear kinetic to rotational energy, right?
Use conservation of energy:
[tex]KE_{Linear}=KE_{Rotational}[/tex]
 
jdboucher said:
so can I do this:

0.5mv^2 = Iw
It should be :
[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}I \omega^2[/tex]
 
Winzer said:
It should be :
[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}I \omega^2[/tex]

0.5(1.49)(19.6)^2 = 0.5(1/12)(1.49+6.55)(2.29)^2w^2

I solved this and got w = 12.76

The answer is wrong though. I checked my work. Did I do something wrong?
 
  • #10
The two bodies stick together, so this is an inelastic collision. Kinetic energy isn't conserved. You have to use angular momentum.

Remember [itex]\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}[/itex].
 
  • #11
vela said:
The two bodies stick together, so this is an inelastic collision. Kinetic energy isn't conserved. You have to use angular momentum.

Remember [itex]\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}[/itex].

So then I need to determine r. Is that d/2?
 
  • #12
Yes, r would be d/2. It's the distance to the pivot point.
 
  • #13
danielatha4 said:
Yes, r would be d/2. It's the distance to the pivot point.

I assume the angle is 90. So L = mvrsin90. If I do that, set it equal to Iw, I get that w= 9.52. According to the online site I'm using that's wrong. Is it my angle?
 
  • #14
Your [itex]I_{final}[/itex] is wrong.
 
  • #15
vela said:
Your [itex]I_{final}[/itex] is wrong.

Ifinal = (1/12)ML^2 = (1/12)(1.49 + 6.55)(2.29)^2

Ifinal = 3.51

Is that wrong?
 
  • #16
Yes, it's wrong. That would be the moment of inertia for a uniform rod of mass 8.04 kg. You have a total mass of 8.04 kg, but it's not distributed as a uniform rod.
 
  • #17
vela said:
Yes, it's wrong. That would be the moment of inertia for a uniform rod of mass 8.04 kg. You have a total mass of 8.04 kg, but it's not distributed as a uniform rod.

(1/12)(6.55+1.49)(2.29)^2 + (1.49)(2.29/2)^2 = 6.12

Its wrong again. Am I not supposed to use the parallel axis theorem?
 
  • #18
jdboucher said:
(1/12)(6.55+1.49)(2.29)^2 + (1.49)(2.29/2)^2 = 6.12

Its wrong again. Am I not supposed to use the parallel axis theorem?

I mean that I assumed the bullet was a point and used mr^2 to solve for its moment of inertia. Thats wrong obviously
 
  • #19
No, the parallel axis theorem let's you calculate the moment of inertia of an object when it's rotating about an axis that doesn't go through its center of mass, like if you were rotating the rod by its end rather than through its center. That's not the case here, so the theorem doesn't apply.

In this problem, the total rotational mass is simply that of the rod (by itself) plus that of the projectile. You have the formula for the rod; just make sure you use the mass of the rod alone since the projectile isn't part of the rod. The projectile is a point mass at a distance [itex]r[/itex] from the rotation axis. Its rotational mass is given by [itex]mr^2[/itex], where [itex]m[/itex] is the mass.
 
  • #20
jdboucher said:
I mean that I assumed the bullet was a point and used mr^2 to solve for its moment of inertia. That's wrong obviously.
No, that's right. You just plugged the wrong mass in for the rod.
 
  • #21
vela said:
No, that's right. You just plugged the wrong mass in for the rod.

Yes you're right. Silly me. I got it now. Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K