Angular Momentum Incorrect Graph?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the total magnitude of angular momentum (Ho) of a particle about point O, with a given velocity of 5.5 m/s. The calculated answer is 43.04, but there is confusion regarding the representation of the velocity vector in the provided graph. Participants clarify that the vector AB indicates direction but does not represent the velocity vector itself. The correct approach involves deriving a unit vector from the position vector to align with the direction of AB.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum calculations, specifically Ho = r x mv
  • Familiarity with vector representation and magnitude
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and their formation
  • Basic principles of physics related to motion and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of angular momentum in detail, focusing on vector cross products
  • Learn how to derive unit vectors from position vectors
  • Explore graphical representations of vectors in physics
  • Review examples of angular momentum problems to solidify understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and angular momentum, as well as educators looking to clarify vector representation in motion problems.

gv3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Determine the total magnitude of angular momentum Ho of the particle about point O. The velocity of the particle is 5.5 m/s.
engineering 4.png

Homework Equations


Ho= r x mv

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 43.04. My question is, isn't the graph wrong? If you take the magnitude of the vector shown in the graph, it doesn't equal 5.5 it equals 6. Without the proper vector from the graph isn't the problem unsolvable? I only knew the answer because i was asked this question twice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only vector I can see indicated in the figure is V, which is shown to be directed along the path AB. AB itself is not the velocity vector, it just indicates its direction.
 
gneill said:
The only vector I can see indicated in the figure is V, which is shown to be directed along the path AB. AB itself is not the velocity vector, it just indicates its direction.
But isn't that vector 2i-4j-4k?
 
gv3 said:
But isn't that vector 2i-4j-4k?
A position vector from A to B might be that, and it would have the same direction as V. But it is not V.
 
gneill said:
A position vector from A to B might be that, and it would have the same direction as V. But it is not V.
My mistake you are right. How would the velocity vector be found then? My professor in his lecture notes looks like he just took the direction of V shown.
 
All you need to take from the vector AB is its direction. Are you familiar with unit vectors? Can you form a unit vector that has the same direction as AB?
 
gneill said:
All you need to take from the vector AB is its direction. Are you familiar with unit vectors? Can you form a unit vector that has the same direction as AB?
yeah it would just be the position vector divided by the magnitude.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
966
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K