Kerr Black Hole Angular Momentum Limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of the Kerr metric in modeling the gravitational field of rotating extended bodies compared to the Schwarzschild metric. While the Schwarzschild metric effectively describes the Earth's gravity field due to Birkhoff's theorem, the Kerr metric lacks a similar theorem, making it inadequate for accurately modeling rotating bodies. The "no hair" theorem indicates that Kerr spacetime does not account for higher order moments, such as quadrupole moments, which are present in real rotating objects like Earth. This results in deviations from the Kerr model when applied to extended bodies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schwarzschild metric and its applications in general relativity
  • Familiarity with the Kerr metric and its implications for rotating black holes
  • Knowledge of Birkhoff's theorem and its significance in gravitational modeling
  • Awareness of the "no hair" theorem and its relevance to black hole physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Birkhoff's theorem in various gravitational contexts
  • Study the Kerr metric in detail, focusing on its limitations and applications
  • Explore the concept of higher order moments in gravitational fields and their effects
  • Investigate the "no hair" theorem and its consequences for black hole characterization
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of general relativity who are interested in the complexities of gravitational modeling for rotating bodies and black holes.

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
Could a rotating extended body exceed that limit?
The Schwarzschild metric seems to model, for example, the earth’s gravity field above the earth’s surface pretty well, even though the Earth is not really a golf-ball sized black hole down at the center. Can the same be said for the Kerr metric? Does it model a rotating extended body’s gravity field well above that body’s surface?

(I am wondering about the magnitude of the angular momentum of that extended body versus that of the Kerr black hole. Isn’t there a limit to how much angular momentum the black hole can have, and might the extended body have more than that limit? Or is that not possible?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
exmarine said:
The Schwarzschild metric seems to model, for example, the earth’s gravity field above the earth’s surface pretty well, even though the Earth is not really a golf-ball sized black hole down at the center.

That's because of Birkhoff's theorem: any vacuum spherically symmetric region of spacetime must be a region of Schwarzschild spacetime.

Note that the Earth is not a perfect sphere, though, so the spacetime around it is not exactly modeled by Schwarzschild spacetime; there are deviations. (One of the deviations is that the Earth is rotating--see below.)

exmarine said:
Can the same be said for the Kerr metric?

No. There is no analogue of Birkhoff's theorem for Kerr spacetime.

Another way of looking at this is: Kerr spacetime has no higher order moments (quadrupole and higher); this follows from the "no hair" theorem. But a real rotating object does have higher order moments, which must be reflected in the spacetime geometry around it. (Note that the Earth itself is an example of this: the Earth has a detectable quadrupole moment, which has been shown to affect the gravitational field and hence the spacetime geometry around it.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: exmarine

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
615
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K