I Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hokhani
  • Start date Start date
hokhani
Messages
562
Reaction score
19
TL;DR
The relation between the quantized values of xyz components of angular momentum and its magnitude
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these configurations gives ##|L^2|=6\hbar^2##!? I would appreciate if help me with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, exactly! There is no realistic configuration that satisfies the requirements.

I'm suprised this example isn't shown more often. It's a good example of why QM isn't just classical mechanics with a bit of uncertainty thrown in. Spin values really, truly do not have well-defined values in a non-eigenstate.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
700
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
612
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K