Is Angular Momentum or Latus Rectum Affected by Thruster-Induced Speed Increase?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of thruster-induced speed increases on angular momentum and latus rectum in orbital mechanics. The user successfully calculated angular momentum (L), gravitational force, centripetal acceleration, and radius of curvature at point P, noting that L increased due to the velocity change. However, confusion arose regarding the relationship between angular momentum and latus rectum, as the user observed conflicting results: an increase in L versus a decrease in the latus rectum for the new elliptical orbit. The professor's hint about the semi-major axis orientation further complicated the user's understanding of the orbital dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum (L = R x P)
  • Knowledge of gravitational force (F = Gmm/r^2)
  • Familiarity with centripetal acceleration (a = v^2/r)
  • Basic concepts of elliptical orbits and latus rectum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between angular momentum and latus rectum in elliptical orbits
  • Learn about the effects of thrust on orbital mechanics and trajectory changes
  • Explore the concept of semi-major and semi-minor axes in elliptical orbits
  • Investigate the role of centripetal force in circular versus elliptical motion
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in orbital mechanics and the effects of thrust on satellite trajectories.

Lucretius
Messages
151
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a shuttle following a circular orbit around a planet. At some point P in the orbit, the shuttle fires thrusters causing the speed at that point to increase. I am supposed to a) find the angular momentum, gravitational force at the point P, centripetal acceleration at the point P, and the radius of curvature at point P. Part B is to say whether the latus rectum of my new orbit is smaller, larger, or equal to that of the circular orbit.

Homework Equations



I used L=R x P, a=v^2/r, and F=Gmm/r^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



I didn't have much problem with part A. The velocity perpendicular to the radius changed, so the cross product for L increased, making L larger. The gravitational force stayed the same at the point, since that only depended on the radius. The centripetal acceleration increased, since v increased, while r remained the same. And lastly, the radius of curvature at the point didn't change, because the radius didn't change instantaneously.

My problem is that, it is known that L, the angular momentum, is directly proportional to the latus rectum, c. But for the ellipse just made, the latus rectum is smaller than that for the circle. Thus my new L should be SMALLER than my first L for the circular orbit. But the velocity increase tells me something different! In other words, when analyzing two different aspects of this orbit, I get both an increase and a decrease in angular momentum, depending on whether I look at the velocity or the latus rectum. What am I missing here?

EDIT: Also, my professor gives a hint that this point P will lie along the semi-major axis of the newly elliptical orbit. But he has drawn the point at a 3' o clock location on the circular orbit. If the thrusters went off here, I would expect the point to lie along the semi-minor axis because the shuttle should move further now in this direction than it has previously! Perhaps this is just a typo?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lucretius said:
The centripetal acceleration increased, since v increased, while r remained the same.
No, centripental acceleration does not change, because the force of gravity does not change.
 
Major axis/minor axis are determined based on the orientation of the
elliptical orbit, so they are not necessarily alligned to your coordinate sistem.
 
You have the "particle" moving in a circle so that its instantaneous velocity is tangential to the circle and it experiences a centripetal acceleration towards the center of the circle (due to gravity).

I might be mistaken, but it doesn't seem like you have considered the directionality of the thruster's acceleration compared to that of the centripetal force correctly in your logic - but I apologize if I'm wrong in this interpretation!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
994
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
751
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K