Angular velocity and acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration and final angular velocity of a gymnast performing a forward double somersault. The initial angular velocity is 0 rad/s, and a torque of 115 N-m is applied for 0.22 seconds with a moment of inertia of 11.4 kg-m². The correct angular acceleration is calculated as 10.08 rad/s² using the formula T = Iα. The final angular velocity, derived from the angular acceleration, is 2.22 rad/s at the end of the 0.22 seconds. Overall, while the calculations were mostly correct, there were minor errors in notation and units that needed clarification.
Kreativitie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey i have this problem and would like to know if what i got is somewhere in the right direction. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated

A gymnast is performing a forward double somersault.

The gymnast’s initial angular velocity is 0 rad/s.
The gymnast generates a 115 N-m torque.
The torque is applied to the gymnast’s body for 0.22 s.
In the layout position, the gymnast’s moment of inertia is 11.4 kg-m2

What is her angular acceleration and her final angular velocity (during layout position)?


Heres what i got

Angular acceleration
T=Iα

115 Nm=11.4 kg-m2(α)
115 Nm/11.4 kg-m2 = 11.4 kg-m2(α)/ 11.4 kg-m2 =10.08 kg-m2

Angular velocity (w)
Tt=I(w)

104 Nm (.22s) = 11.4kg-m2(w)
104Nm(.22s) / 11.4kg-m2 = 11.4kg-m2(w) / 11.4kg-m2 = 2.22 kg-m2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to know which equations you should use, but you must develop a clearer notation:
"115 Nm=11.4 kg-m2(α)
115 Nm/11.4 kg-m2 = 11.4 kg-m2(α)/ 11.4 kg-m2"

Your second line equaltiy is certainly consistent with your first line equality; i.e, your doing correct maths.

However, when writing units, "kg-m2" is very cryptic; write instead kg*m^2
(Or:kg*m^{2})

Your continued equality has wrong units, apart from being a very unfortunate way of notation:

We know that:Nm=\frac{kg*m^{2}}{s^{2}}
Hence:\frac{Nm}{kg*m^{2}}=\frac{1}{s^{2}}
Surely, this is the unit of angular acceleration!
In order to make a clearer notation, this is an example:
115Nm=11.4kg*m^{2}\alpha
\alpha=\frac{115}{11.4}\frac{Nm}{kg*m^{2}}=10.08s^{-2}

Why have you suddenly changed 115 into 104 in your equation for the angular velocity?
You end up with wrong units again, and you must work on your notations.
 
/s

Based on the given information, your calculations seem to be in the right direction. However, there are some things that can be improved upon. Let's break down the problem and see where we can make some adjustments.

First, we know that the gymnast's initial angular velocity is 0 rad/s. This means that she starts from rest and has no initial rotational motion. Next, we are given the torque applied to her body, which is 115 N-m. This torque is responsible for causing the gymnast's angular acceleration. So, we can use the formula T = Iα to calculate the angular acceleration, where T is the torque, I is the moment of inertia, and α is the angular acceleration.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

115 N-m = 11.4 kg-m2(α)

Rearranging the equation to solve for α, we get:

α = 115 N-m / 11.4 kg-m2 = 10.08 rad/s2

This is the angular acceleration of the gymnast during the 0.22 seconds that the torque is applied.

Next, we can use the formula ω = ω0 + αt to calculate the final angular velocity (ω) of the gymnast at the end of the 0.22 seconds. Here, ω0 is the initial angular velocity (which is 0 rad/s), α is the angular acceleration we just calculated, and t is the time (0.22 seconds).

Plugging in the values, we get:

ω = 0 + (10.08 rad/s2)(0.22 s) = 2.22 rad/s

So, the final angular velocity of the gymnast during the layout position is 2.22 rad/s.

In summary, your calculations were mostly correct, but there were some minor errors in the units and equations used. By following the correct formulas and units, you can ensure that your calculations are accurate and in the right direction. Keep up the good work!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K