Angular Velocity Homework: Rigid Body Rotation w/ 3 rad/s

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a rigid body rotating with an angular velocity of 3 radians per second about an axis defined by the expression ax - 2ay + 2az. Participants are exploring how to express this mathematically and clarify the meaning of the given expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to express the angular velocity vector and are seeking confirmation on their mathematical representations. Questions are raised about the interpretation of the expression ax - 2ay + 2az, specifically whether it represents a vector or a plane equation. There is also inquiry into the significance of the units in the expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing attempts at solutions and seeking clarification on various aspects of the problem. Some have offered guidance on the need for units and the interpretation of vector notation, while others are questioning the reasoning behind specific expressions and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the notation used for unit vectors, with some participants noting that ax, ay, and az are alternative representations for the standard unit vectors i, j, and k. The need for clarity on the mathematical expressions and their physical implications is emphasized.

4real4sure
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Rigid body is rotating with 3 radians per second about an axis parallel to ax - 2ay + 2az. Express this mathematically.


Homework Equations


ax - 2ay + 2az


The Attempt at a Solution


w(vector)=w(1,-2,2) / 3 = (1,-2,2)
I need confirmation if this is correct or not. In either case, reasoning would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The last statement itself was an attempt and I need "confirmation" if it is okay or not.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
w(vector)=w(1,-2,2) / 3 = (1,-2,2)
I need confirmation if this is correct or not. In either case, reasoning would be much appreciated.
 
could you elaborate more on the ax - 2ay + 2az expression. Is this supposed to a vector as in ai -2aj +2ak where i,j,k are unit vectors? or is it the description of a plane where all points (x,y,z) reside on this plane ax - 2ay + 2az = constant ?
 
jedishrfu said:
could you elaborate more on the ax - 2ay + 2az expression. Is this supposed to a vector as in ai -2aj +2ak where i,j,k are unit vectors? or is it the description of a plane where all points (x,y,z) reside on this plane ax - 2ay + 2az = constant ?
Some books use the notation ax, ay, and az instead of i, j, and k for the Cartesian basis vectors.

4real4sure said:
3. The Attempt at a Solution
w(vector)=w(1,-2,2) / 3 = (1,-2,2)
I need confirmation if this is correct or not. In either case, reasoning would be much appreciated.
It would be correct if you had units on there. As far as the reasoning, you are supposed to supply that. Why do you think that's the way to solve this problem?
 
ax, ay, and az are unit vectors and I need to figure out the statement for the vector "w" which is in the attempt.
 
It would be correct if you had units on there.

I didn't get this
 
Why don't you explain what you're doing?
 
Here it is, A rigid body rotates with angular velocity 3 rad/sec which remains stable. r is the distance vector from origin to a point Q, the position of a particle in the body. The velocity u of the body at Q is given by u = w X r (where u, w ,r are vectors). The rigid body is rotating parallel to ax — 2ay + 2az (where ax, ay, az are unit vectors) and passing through point (2, —3, 1), determine the velocity of the body at (1, 3,4).

Here I need to figure out vector u, vector r and vector w.
vector r=(1,3,4)-(2,-3,1)=(-1,6,3)
Now I need to find vector w for which I started out the question basically.
 
  • #10
I'm asking you to explain why you wrote
w(vector)=w(1,-2,2) / 3 = (1,-2,2)
Was this just some random combination of symbols? Is the 3 in the denominator because the angular speed is 3 rad/sec?
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K