Angular velocity to horizontal?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between constant angular velocity and its conversion to linear acceleration. It highlights that while angular velocity is a form of constant motion, it does not directly translate to linear acceleration without considering factors like radius and tangential velocity. An example using a yoyo illustrates how angular momentum can convert to linear momentum when the yoyo is yanked, emphasizing that the energy remains unchanged in terms of magnitude. The conversation also touches on calculating tangential velocity using angular velocity and radius, leading to a better understanding of motion in circular paths. Overall, the thread clarifies the distinctions between angular and linear motion principles.
rustys111
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
angular velocity to horizontal??

hey, i was just wondering whether a costant angular velocity can be converted to an equivilant straight horizontal or vertical acceleration as angular velocity is already considered to be a constant acceleration??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rustys111! :wink:
rustys111 said:
hey, i was just wondering whether a costant angular velocity can be converted to an equivilant straight horizontal or vertical acceleration as angular velocity is already considered to be a constant acceleration??

not following you :confused:

can you give an example? :smile:
 


Let's consider a classical form of constant angular rotation, a "sleeping" yoyo toy. Because the string on the yoyo is loose, the yoyo can spin at the bottom of the extended string, or "sleep" (I think this is the correct word). When you yank the string, the yoyo will "wake up" and start climbing the string, and if it has enough "spin" or angular momentum, it can climb the string all the way up to your hand. This is an example of angular momentum and energy being converted into linear momentum and energy. However, the source of the momentum and energy is not conversion of angular "acceleration", but it is the constant angular velocity. The "acceleration" you may be referring to is the centripital force on any mass in a rotating object, which is perpendicular to the instantaneous velocity of that mass, and does not change the magnitude of the velocity, only its direction. Because the magnitide of the velocity is not being changed, the energy of that mass is not being changed. This comment applies to every mass in the rotating object.
 


k u if you knew omega rad/s how much the angle is changing with respect to time
omega kinda looks like w then you could fing the tangential velocity by
(omega)(r) r=radius so u would know how fast the oustide of the circle is roatating
then you could figure the period of the circle how long it takes to make 1 full revoltion
and if we knew the diamter then u could do v=d/t how much distance the outside of the circle divided by thhe time.
 
cragar said:
if you knew omega rad/s how much the angle is changing with respect to time
omega kinda looks like w then you could fing the tangential velocity by
(omega)(r) r=radius so …

Hi cragar! :smile:

Have an omega: ω :wink:
 


sweet thanks
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
617
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K