Another electrostatics question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bitrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on understanding the calculation of the electric field above a charged disc using Coulomb's law and the Pythagorean theorem. The user expresses confusion regarding the necessity of multiplying Coulomb's law by the cosine of theta when determining the electric field components. It is established that the electric field dE from a charge element points radially outward, with its components along the z and x axes. The x components cancel out due to symmetry, while the z components contribute to the resultant electric field, leading to the expression E cosθ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically cosine
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of the Pythagorean theorem in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their properties
  • Investigate the effects of charge symmetry on electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and charge distributions.

bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
There's no problem as such here, just a bit of confusion I'm having regarding finding the electric field. On the following page, second example, is the equation for finding the electric field above a charged disc http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/elelin.html#c2". I understand how they used the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance from the charged ring to the point on the Y axis to find r, but I'm not understanding why Coulomb's law had to be multiplied by the cosine of theta first?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the electric field dE due to the element of charge shown in the figure is along r and points away from P. This field has two components, one along z and one along x. The x component is canceled by an element of charge diametrically opposed on the other side of the ring. The z component of the diametrically opposed charge is the same dE cosθ. So when you add all the horizontal components you get zero, but when you add all the z-components you get E cosθ.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K