Answer Force Constant & Work Done in a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter warmfire540
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a spring's force constant and the work done when a mass is suspended from it. The original poster presents a scenario where a 500-g mass stretches a spring by 2.5 cm and then inquires about the work done when the mass is pulled down an additional 5 cm.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the appropriate equations for calculating work done on the spring, questioning why a specific formula is used over another. There is discussion about measuring displacement from the equilibrium position and the role of gravitational potential energy in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between spring potential energy and gravitational potential energy, suggesting that the work done on the spring should account for the existing load. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of potential energy calculations in the context of a spring system under load, with some uncertainty regarding the reference points for measuring energy changes.

warmfire540
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I have a quick question:

10. When a 500-g mass is suspended from a spring, it stretches 2.5 cm.
What is the force constant of the spring? If you now pull the mass
down producing a further displacement of 5 cm, what is the work
done on the spring?


The answer for the second part the professor has:

W=.5kx^2 = .245J

How come we don't use the equation:
W=.5k(xf^2-xi^2) doesn't the spring already have a load on it that stretches it?
I got .49J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x must always be measured from the equilibrium position - which means: whatever position you can leave the spring in, without it starting to oscillate.

If there was no mass on the spring, you would use the equation you gave.

Does that make sense?
 
don't neglect gravity

warmfire540 said:
The answer for the second part the professor has:

W=.5kx^2 = .245J

How come we don't use the equation:
W=.5k(xf^2-xi^2) doesn't the spring already have a load on it that stretches it?
I got .49J
It's a bit tricky to understand.

When you use .5kx^2 with x measured from the equilibrium position, you are really finding the total potential energy change of the system including both spring PE plus gravitational PE. You are correct that the energy stored as spring PE is given by .5kx^2 where x is measured from the unstretched position of the spring. But what they are really asking for is the work you must do on the spring to stretch it an additional distance, not the total work done on the spring. (Gravity does part of the work.)

Let's work it out in detail and maybe it'll be clearer:

The amount of stretch in the spring when at equilibrium = mg/k
The spring PE at equilibrium = .5k(mg/k)^2
The amount of stretch in the spring when pulled an addition distance x = mg/k + x
The spring PE at that point = .5k(mg/k + x)^2

Measured from equilibrium, the change in spring PE = .5k(mg/k + x)^2 - .5k(mg/k)^2
Measured from equilibrium, the change in gravitational PE = -mgx

Measured from equilibrium, the total change in potential energy
= .5k(mg/k + x)^2 - .5k(mg/k)^2 -mgx = .5kx^2

Make sense?
 
I understand it that way : (sorry if I repeat something you said Doc Al)

The string in the equilibrium position has a certain amount of elastic potential energy. We can take this equilibrium position's potential energy as a reference. You have to find the work done on the spring, so the difference of energy between its final and initial state. The elastic potential energy of a string is 1/2 * kx², mesured from the equilibrium position (of the system we study, here it's the loaded string equilibrium position). Here we have a new equilibrium position, and so the displacement is only 5cm. And so the initial energy (being our reference) is 0 and the final energy (relative to our reference) is 1/2 kx², where x=5cm.

I hope I helped you understand if it wasnt already the case with previous explanations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K