Answer Force Constant & Work Done in a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter warmfire540
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the force constant of a spring and the work done when a mass is suspended from it. A 500-g mass stretches the spring by 2.5 cm, leading to the calculation of the spring constant using Hooke's Law. The work done on the spring when further displaced by 5 cm is calculated using the formula W = 0.5kx², yielding a result of 0.245 J. The conversation clarifies that the work done should be measured from the equilibrium position, emphasizing the distinction between total potential energy and the work required to stretch the spring further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of potential energy in elastic systems
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Ability to perform basic algebraic manipulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hooke's Law and its applications in mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy
  • Explore advanced topics in oscillatory motion and energy conservation
  • Investigate real-world applications of springs in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of elasticity and energy conservation in spring systems.

warmfire540
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I have a quick question:

10. When a 500-g mass is suspended from a spring, it stretches 2.5 cm.
What is the force constant of the spring? If you now pull the mass
down producing a further displacement of 5 cm, what is the work
done on the spring?


The answer for the second part the professor has:

W=.5kx^2 = .245J

How come we don't use the equation:
W=.5k(xf^2-xi^2) doesn't the spring already have a load on it that stretches it?
I got .49J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x must always be measured from the equilibrium position - which means: whatever position you can leave the spring in, without it starting to oscillate.

If there was no mass on the spring, you would use the equation you gave.

Does that make sense?
 
don't neglect gravity

warmfire540 said:
The answer for the second part the professor has:

W=.5kx^2 = .245J

How come we don't use the equation:
W=.5k(xf^2-xi^2) doesn't the spring already have a load on it that stretches it?
I got .49J
It's a bit tricky to understand.

When you use .5kx^2 with x measured from the equilibrium position, you are really finding the total potential energy change of the system including both spring PE plus gravitational PE. You are correct that the energy stored as spring PE is given by .5kx^2 where x is measured from the unstretched position of the spring. But what they are really asking for is the work you must do on the spring to stretch it an additional distance, not the total work done on the spring. (Gravity does part of the work.)

Let's work it out in detail and maybe it'll be clearer:

The amount of stretch in the spring when at equilibrium = mg/k
The spring PE at equilibrium = .5k(mg/k)^2
The amount of stretch in the spring when pulled an addition distance x = mg/k + x
The spring PE at that point = .5k(mg/k + x)^2

Measured from equilibrium, the change in spring PE = .5k(mg/k + x)^2 - .5k(mg/k)^2
Measured from equilibrium, the change in gravitational PE = -mgx

Measured from equilibrium, the total change in potential energy
= .5k(mg/k + x)^2 - .5k(mg/k)^2 -mgx = .5kx^2

Make sense?
 
I understand it that way : (sorry if I repeat something you said Doc Al)

The string in the equilibrium position has a certain amount of elastic potential energy. We can take this equilibrium position's potential energy as a reference. You have to find the work done on the spring, so the difference of energy between its final and initial state. The elastic potential energy of a string is 1/2 * kx², mesured from the equilibrium position (of the system we study, here it's the loaded string equilibrium position). Here we have a new equilibrium position, and so the displacement is only 5cm. And so the initial energy (being our reference) is 0 and the final energy (relative to our reference) is 1/2 kx², where x=5cm.

I hope I helped you understand if it wasnt already the case with previous explanations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
988
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K