Answer Limit of a Series: Sum of 1+(2)^n/(3^n) from 1 to ∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter fk378
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence of the series given by the expression 1 + (2^n)/(3^n) from n=1 to infinity. Participants are exploring the nature of the series and the methods to evaluate its sum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to separate the series into two parts and analyze their limits, leading to a conclusion of 0, which contrasts with the book's answer of 5/2. Some participants question the distinction between the limit of a sequence and the sum of a series, while others point out the lack of consideration for partial sums in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications on the concepts of series and limits. There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the evaluation of the series, and some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider partial sums.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may have misunderstood the relationship between the limit of individual terms and the sum of the series, as well as the necessity of calculating partial sums to arrive at the correct conclusion.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether the series is convergent or divergent. If convergent, find its sum.

sum of [1+(2)^n] / (3^n)
from 1 to inf


Homework Equations


I know that the sum of a geometric series is 1/(1-r)


The Attempt at a Solution


The sum of a series is the limit of its partial sums.
I separate the summation into 2 parts: 1/(3^n) + (2^n)/(3^n)

I can see from this that the limits of both of these approach 0, so I conclude that the sum the series is 0.

However, my book says the answer is 5/2 and I tried to solve this a different way and got 5/2 as well. I re-wrote the separate summations as (1/3)^n + (2/3)^n and notice the ratio, r, is 1/3 and 2/3, respectively. Applying the "relevant equation" of 1/(1-r) I solve the summations and get 5/2.

However, if the sum of a series is the limit of its partial sums, why am I getting a different value for my first attempt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing the limit of a sequence with the sum of a series. That's all.
 
My book says that "the sum of a series is the limit of the sequence of partial sums."
 
You didn't do any partial sums. You just looked at the limits of the individual terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K