Answer: Maximum Work Function for 900nm IR Light

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum work function for a surface to emit electrons when illuminated with 900nm infrared light, within the context of the photoelectric effect.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the energy of light at a given wavelength and the work function required to emit electrons. There are attempts to calculate kinetic energy and work function using the photoelectric effect equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the work function in relation to the energy of the incident light. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations involved, with some participants questioning the correctness of their approaches and results.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the assumptions regarding the kinetic energy of emitted electrons and the implications of using the maximum work function for the emission of electrons when illuminated by the specified wavelength.

babypudding
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Maximum work function??

Homework Statement


What is the maximum work function for a surface to emit electrons when illuminated with 900nm infrared light?


Homework Equations


K= 1/2mv2
= hf - work function

wavelength =h/p = h/mv

The Attempt at a Solution



p=h/wavelength
= 6.626 x 10-34 / 900 x 10-9
= 7.362 x 10-28 kgm/s

p=mv
v=p/m
=7.362 x 10-28 / 9.11x10-31
= 1027.66 m/s

K=1/2mv2
=1/2 x 9.11x10-31 x 1027.662
=4.81x10-25 J

frequency x wavelength = c (no sure if this is right, where c is the speed of light)
f= 3x108/ 900 x 10-9
=270

work function= hf- K
= 6.626 x 10-34 x 270 - 4.81x10-25
= -4.81J
My answer looks wrong, so I think I did it wrong. Please lead me to the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I imagine they're looking for the workfunction to be the energy of the light at that wavelength since that will be enough to free an electron with no kinetic energy.
 


So
K=1/2mv2
=1/2 x 9.11x10-31 x 1027.662
=4.81x10-25 J

That should be right?
 


babypudding said:
So
K=1/2mv2
=1/2 x 9.11x10-31 x 1027.662
=4.81x10-25 J

That should be right?

No. The wavelength of the radiation is 900nm. This is not the wavelength of the electron. So, the value you have for the electron kinetic energy is wrong.

Read Kurdt's advice again:

I imagine they're looking for the workfunction to be the energy of the light at that wavelength since that will be enough to free an electron with no kinetic energy.

If the material had the biggest possible work function it could have and still give off an electron when illuminated with 900nm radiation, then the electrons released will have K=0. Use this kinetic energy in the photoelectric effect equation to solve for what the work function must be in this case:

[tex]hf=K-\phi[/tex]
 


Ok. Shouldn't it be hf = K + work function ?
h= 6.626 x 10-34
K=0
f= 3x108 / 900 x10-9 = 3.33x1014

So hf = 0 + work function
work function = 2.21 x 10-19 J

Is this right now?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K