Answer Me Precisely: Electronic Density Probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karrar
  • Start date Start date
Karrar
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have some question about electronic density propbablity
1- Is there really picture shown in Lab (( practically)). for probablity density of certain atoms
2- what is the evidence that shown distrubution of orbitals is true
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the answer to 2 is Chemistry.
 
For question 1 you may get the information you need by googling "scanning tunnel microscope".Like Nabeshin I think that the main evidence for question 2.comes from chemistry
 
In any case, if I understand your imprecise question correctly then the answer was given in an article in Nature in 2004: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03183
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nabeshin said:
I believe the answer to 2 is Chemistry.
You may need to expand your reason a little bit with explanation.
 
Thanks Dale I have been read the paper And know the answer thanks for all
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
791
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Back
Top