Answer Me Precisely: Electronic Density Probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karrar
  • Start date Start date
Karrar
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have some question about electronic density propbablity
1- Is there really picture shown in Lab (( practically)). for probablity density of certain atoms
2- what is the evidence that shown distrubution of orbitals is true
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the answer to 2 is Chemistry.
 
For question 1 you may get the information you need by googling "scanning tunnel microscope".Like Nabeshin I think that the main evidence for question 2.comes from chemistry
 
In any case, if I understand your imprecise question correctly then the answer was given in an article in Nature in 2004: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03183
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nabeshin said:
I believe the answer to 2 is Chemistry.
You may need to expand your reason a little bit with explanation.
 
Thanks Dale I have been read the paper And know the answer thanks for all
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
808
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Back
Top