Answer: Prove Injectivity of Bijection in F[x] Modulo a Fixed Polynomial P(x)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the injectivity of a function defined from a set of tuples of field elements to the quotient of polynomials modulo a fixed polynomial. The context involves concepts from abstract algebra, specifically dealing with polynomial rings and congruence classes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of congruence classes and the implications of polynomial degrees in the context of injectivity. There are attempts to clarify the notation used in the original post, particularly regarding the representation of polynomials and equivalence classes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with some participants providing insights into the proof of injectivity while others raise concerns about notation and definitions. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in mathematical expressions and the relationships between different mathematical objects.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding specific notations and definitions, particularly concerning the representation of polynomials and their degrees. Participants are questioning the assumptions made in the original proof attempt.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [tex]n\,\in\,\mathbb{N}[/tex]. Let F be a field, and suppose that [tex]p(x)\,\in\,F[x][/tex] is a polynomial of degree (n + 1).

Let S be the set:

[tex]S\,=\,\left\{\left(a_0,\,\ldots,\,a_n\right)\,:\,a_i\,\in\,F\right\}[/tex]

Define [tex]\phi[/tex]: [tex]S\,\rightarrow\,F[x]/\left(p(x)\right)[/tex] via

[tex]\phi\left(\left(a_0,\,\ldots,\,a_n\right)\right)\,=\,\left[a_0\,+\,a_1\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,a_n\,x^n\right][/tex]

Prove that [tex]\phi[/tex] is a bijection.

Homework Equations



[tex]f\,:\,B\,\rightarrow\,C[/tex] is injective provided that whenever f(a) = f(b) in C, then a = b in B.

[tex]f\,:\,B\,\rightarrow\,C[/tex] is surjective iff I am f = C.

[tex]f\,:\,B\,\rightarrow\,C[/tex] is bijective provided that f is both injective and surjective.

If [tex]f\,:\,B\,\rightarrow\,C[/tex] is a function, then the image of f is this subset of C:

[tex]Im\,f\,=\,\left{c\,|\,c\,=\,f(b)\,for\,some\,b\,\in\,B\right}\,=\,\left{f(b)\,|\,b\,\in\,B\right}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Prove Injectivity:

Here, I need to prove that whenever F[a]/(p(a)) = F/(p(b)) in F[x]/(p(x)), then a = b in S.

Now I need expressions for F[a]/(p(a))...

[tex]F[a]\,\equiv\,g(a)\,\left(mod\,p(a)\right)[/tex]

And F/(p(b))...

[tex]F<b>\,\equiv\,h(b)\,\left(mod\,p(b)\right)</b>[/tex]

Now how do I show that a = b in S?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


VinnyCee said:
[
Here, I need to prove that whenever F[a]/(p(a)) = F/(p(b)) in F[x]/(p(x)), then a = b in S.


What do you mean with F[a]/(p(a))? In fact, what do you mean with F[a], I'm not used to such a notations...
 


The brackets denote congruence class...

Definition: Let a and n be integers with n > 0. The congruence class of a modulo n (denoted [a]) is the set of all those integers that are congruent to a modulo n, that is, [tex][a]\,=\,\left\{b\,|\,b\,\in\,\mathbb{Z}\,\,and\,\,b\,\equiv\,a\,\left(mod\,n\right)\right\}[/tex].

The ring P of polynomials with coefficients in R is denoted by R[x].
To prove injectivity, assume that you have

[tex]\phi\left(\left(a_0,\,\ldots,\,a_n\right)\right)\,=\,F_1[x]\,=\,\left[a_0\,+\,a_1\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,a_n\,x^n\right][/tex]

[tex]\phi\left(\left(b_0,\,\ldots,\,b_n\right)\right)\,=\,F_2[x]\,=\,\left[b_0\,+\,b_1\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,b_n\,x^n\right][/tex]Assume that [tex]F_1[x]\,\equiv\,F_2[x]\,\left(p(x)\right)[/tex].

[tex]\left[a_0\,+\,a_1\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,a_n\,x^n\right]\,-\,\left[b_0\,+\,b_1\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,b_n\,x^n\right]\,|\,p(x)[/tex]

[tex]\left[a_0\,-\,b_0\right]\,+\,\left[a_1\,-\,b_1\right]\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,\left[a_n\,-\,b_n\right]\,x^n\,|\,p(x)[/tex]

But, p(x) is a polynomial of degree n + 1, making the above statement impossible (since a higher degree polynomial cannot divide a lower degree polynomial) unless each of the coefficients on the left side are zero ([tex]a_i\,=\,0\,\forall\,i\,\in\,\mathbb{N})[/tex].

[tex]deg\left(F_1[x]\right)\,=\,deg\left(F_2[x]\right)\,<\,deg\left(p(x)\right)[/tex]

This means the coefficients are equal, and thus we have shown that [tex]\phi[/tex] is injective.

Now, to prove that it is surjective...
 
Last edited:


Your proof is good, but you must beware of your notations, things like

[tex]F_1[x]=[a_0+...+a_nx^n][/tex] or [tex]deg(F_1[x])[/tex]

make no sense. [tex]F_1[x][/tex] is a ring of polynomials, while [tex][a_0+...+a_nx^n][/tex] is an equivalence class of polynomials. You can't say that they're equal...

Likewise, you can't take the degree of a ring of polynomials...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K