ANSYS WORKBENCH 14: Simply support option disabled

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum deflection of a beam due to its own weight using ANSYS Workbench 14. Users inquire about applying uniform distributed loading and enabling simply support options, which are disabled for 3D solid elements. It is suggested that simply supported conditions are applicable only to line or shell elements, not 3D solids. An alternative approach includes using remote displacements to constrain the beam's motion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding element types in finite element analysis (FEA) for accurate modeling.
polka129
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hello..

i am trying to determine the maximum deflection of a beam on account of its sagging due to its own weight.
I have the CAD MODEL of the beam and i import its IGS into ANSYS WB14.static structural.

1.is it a uniform distributed loading case?

2.i need to simply support the beam at both ends..but when i select the lower edge of the beam and goto SUPPORTS i find that the simply supported option is there but DISABLED(greyed out)..what to do now?

3.i need to apply the loading..how to go about this?

THIS IS NOT A HOMEWORK PLEASE!..
 
You could have easily used hand calculations for the same, why do you need FEA?

Also, how about just use plane line (beam) elements instead of full 3d structure?

Simply supported option (probably) only works for line (& possibly shell) elements. It does not work for 3d solid elements.

Or if you really want to use your CAD , try remote displacements in which you can constrain linear and rotational motions along each axes.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K