Anti-reflection coating and FULL reflection coatings

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coating Reflection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of anti-reflection coatings and full reflection coatings, specifically focusing on the conditions required for achieving optimal transmission and reflection at specific wavelengths. Participants explore the thickness of layers needed for these coatings and the implications of using multiple layers.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to achieve good anti-reflection at a specific wavelength, a layer with a thickness of d=lambda/4 is necessary, and that multiple layers could enhance transmission further.
  • Another participant asserts that reflection cannot exceed the natural reflectivity of the surface without an interface, implying that the best reflection is achieved with no additional layers.
  • A different participant references a source indicating that a stack of dielectrics can improve reflection, suggesting that there may be methods to enhance reflectivity beyond the natural limits of a surface.
  • One participant challenges the idea that reflection cannot be improved, arguing that if the natural reflectivity is less than 100%, a cover with higher reflectivity could be beneficial, citing high-reflectivity mirrors used in laser engineering that achieve over 99.8% reflection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the potential for improving reflection beyond natural limits, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the definitions of reflectivity and the conditions under which coatings are applied, as well as the specific wavelengths being discussed. The mathematical relationships and physical principles underlying these coatings are not fully explored.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,

to obtain good anti-reflection at one specific wavelength, a layer of the right index of refraction is deposited on a certain surface. The layer thickness must be d=lambda/4...
This achieves better transmission. If we used multiple layers we would get even better transmission.

What if we wanted to obtain the opposite effect, full reflection at a specific wavelength lambda? How wide would the layer need to be? Simply d=lambda/2?

Thanks
fisico30
 
Science news on Phys.org
The reflection cannot be made larger than it is with no interface.
That is, the best interface for maximum reflection is none.
 
Hello Meir,

i just found the following: http://www.lamdapacific.com/lamda_admin/Lamda_Edit/UploadFile/2011222112937198.pdf

It seems that a certain stack of dielectrics can actually improve the reflection...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Meir Achuz said:
The reflection cannot be made larger than it is with no interface.
That is, the best interface for maximum reflection is none.

May be I don't understand something, but if natural reflectivity of the surface is less than 100 %, you probably can use some cover with the reflectivity higher than that of the surface. With respect to multilayer dielectric mirror, typical reflection coeficient of so called high-reflectivity (HR) mirrors which are used in laser engineering is more than 99.8 % (I've met mirrors with 99.99 %, though at 45 deg of incidence). The layers of a HR mirror usually are deposited on a glass substrate, with typical Fresnel reflectivity of about 4 %.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K