Thickness of a partially reflective copper mirror

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fabrication of a copper layer intended to be 41% reflective at a wavelength of 1521nm. Participants explore the theoretical basis for calculating the thickness of the copper layer using an exponential formula related to absorption and reflection, and they examine the discrepancies between expected and observed reflectance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for calculating the thickness of a copper layer based on desired reflectance and absorption coefficient, leading to a calculated thickness of 6.25nm.
  • Another participant clarifies that the exponential formula used pertains to absorption and transmission, suggesting that reflection may be influenced by additional factors, including the substrate.
  • A participant questions the assumption that the situation is straightforward due to normal incidence, indicating a need for deeper theoretical understanding.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of energy transmission and absorption, with one participant noting that if energy is transmitted and absorbed, it raises questions about the absence of reflection.
  • Another participant explains that at the interface, part of the energy is reflected while part enters the second medium, suggesting that the observed low reflectivity aligns with the high transparency of the medium.
  • Participants discuss the potential utility of an online calculator for determining reflection coefficients for varying copper layer thicknesses on a substrate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the initial formula for predicting reflectance, with some suggesting additional factors must be considered. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the calculations and the underlying physics of reflection and transmission.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the interaction of light with the copper layer and substrate, as well as the specific conditions under which the measurements were taken.

Ngineer
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

We are trying to fabricate a copper layer that is 41% reflective to a beam of 1521nm wavelength.

The formula I have used to calculate the thickness is:

R = 1 - e-αt

Where
R: desired reflectance of mirror
t: thickness of mirror that would produce said reflectance
α: material- and wavelength-specific absorption coefficient. (for copper at 1521nm: α = 8.4327e+5 cm-1, from http://refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main&book=Cu&page=Rakic)

For these values, I get t=6.25nm. When they fabricated it at the lab, there was almost no reflection at all.

Is the formula wrong? I based it on the transmission of a mirror being approximately T=e-αt and R being 1-T for a mirror. Is there a siginificant amount of energy absorbed by the copper itself?

Your help is highly appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
That exponential formula represents how much of the radiation entering the sample is absorbed. The rest goes through.
Reflection is another story. It may depend on the substrate too.
Maybe this will be useful
http://www.filmetrics.com/reflectance-calculator
 
Hi Nasu,

Reflection is what we are interested in. Unfortunately, the link you provided does not offer an insight into the theory involved. Where do I start reading?

I have assumed it would be rather simple as only normal incidence is involved.
 
Also, if a portion of the energy is transmitted, and the rest is absorbed (as described by this formula), wouldn't that mean that no reflection at all takes place?

Moreover, the fabricated mirror was almost completely transmissive, and not 59% transmissive as it should according to the formula (regardless of whether remaining energy is reflected or absorbed).
 
At the interface part of the beam is reflected, part enters the second medium. Your formula describes how this second part behaves as it propagates through the medium.

And your observed behaviour makes sense. If the medium is very transparent, the reflectivity is very low.

You can use that online calculator to calculate the reflection coefficient for layers of copper of various thicknesses on a substrate. I suppose your copper layer is on some substrate, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K