stedwards
- 416
- 46
Might I open a slightly different manner of query that might have some resolution?
It could very well be that this idea is not very good. If so, I would like to know why, in the language that even a non-particle physicist would understand.
We could represent a standard model particle ##P## as ##P=a X_1 + b X_2 + c X_3## having ##SU(3)## symmetry, requiring that ##a^2+b^2+c^2=1##, 'cause there is just one particle.
Generally, for ##P## having ##SU(n)## symmetry then there are ##n## terms, right?
Given that all this is not too stupid, what is the action of the operator ##CPT## on ##P## ? I have no idea how to apply the action of ##C##, ##P##, and then ##T ## is applied.
Say ## \bar{P} = CPT(P)##. I assume that if ##\bar{P} = P##, then ##P## is it's own antiparticle and for all standard model particles, ##(CPT)^2 P = P##.
It could very well be that this idea is not very good. If so, I would like to know why, in the language that even a non-particle physicist would understand.
We could represent a standard model particle ##P## as ##P=a X_1 + b X_2 + c X_3## having ##SU(3)## symmetry, requiring that ##a^2+b^2+c^2=1##, 'cause there is just one particle.
Generally, for ##P## having ##SU(n)## symmetry then there are ##n## terms, right?
Given that all this is not too stupid, what is the action of the operator ##CPT## on ##P## ? I have no idea how to apply the action of ##C##, ##P##, and then ##T ## is applied.
Say ## \bar{P} = CPT(P)##. I assume that if ##\bar{P} = P##, then ##P## is it's own antiparticle and for all standard model particles, ##(CPT)^2 P = P##.
Last edited: