Antiparticles of Standard Model gauge bosons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion regarding the antiparticles of Standard Model gauge bosons, it is established that all elementary bosons, except for the W boson, are their own antiparticles. The W boson consists of W+ and W- which are antiparticles of each other. Gluons, characterized by their color charge, do not have distinct antiparticles; rather, they are their own antiparticles, as they belong to real representations in quantum field theory. The distinction between gluons and their antiparticles is less clear-cut due to the nature of color charge and the representation theory involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge bosons in the Standard Model
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of electroweak symmetry breaking
  • Basic grasp of group representations, particularly real vs. complex representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of SU(2) and SU(3) gauge groups in particle physics
  • Learn about electroweak symmetry breaking and its implications for particle masses
  • Explore the concept of charge conjugation and its role in defining antiparticles
  • Investigate the representation theory of gauge bosons in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics, quantum field theorists, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of gauge bosons and their properties in the Standard Model.

  • #31
Might I open a slightly different manner of query that might have some resolution?

It could very well be that this idea is not very good. If so, I would like to know why, in the language that even a non-particle physicist would understand.

We could represent a standard model particle ##P## as ##P=a X_1 + b X_2 + c X_3## having ##SU(3)## symmetry, requiring that ##a^2+b^2+c^2=1##, 'cause there is just one particle.

Generally, for ##P## having ##SU(n)## symmetry then there are ##n## terms, right?

Given that all this is not too stupid, what is the action of the operator ##CPT## on ##P## ? I have no idea how to apply the action of ##C##, ##P##, and then ##T ## is applied.

Say ## \bar{P} = CPT(P)##. I assume that if ##\bar{P} = P##, then ##P## is it's own antiparticle and for all standard model particles, ##(CPT)^2 P = P##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
stedwards said:
Say P¯=CPT(P) \bar{P} = CPT(P). I assume that if P¯=P\bar{P} = P, then PP is it's own antiparticle and for all standard model particles, (CPT)2P=P(CPT)^2 P = P.

You don't need the invariance under CPT to have particle=antiparticle... In fact any particle in the Standard Model should be invariant under CPT.
For the particle= antiparticle you have the action of C alone.
 
  • #33
ChrisVer said:
You don't need the invariance under CPT to have particle=antiparticle... In fact any particle in the Standard Model should be invariant under CPT.
For the particle= antiparticle you have the action of C alone.

Say, for example, ##\frac{i}{\sqrt{3}}R + \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}G - \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}B##, how would you apply charge conjugation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K