Understanding the Antisymmetric Nature of Wavefunctions for Fermions

  • Thread starter Thread starter saray1360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the wave function for fermions must be antisymmetric due to their indistinguishable nature, which leads to the Pauli exclusion principle. When two fermions are interchanged, their wave function changes sign, indicating antisymmetry. The simplest form of a two-particle wave function that satisfies this condition is constructed using a Slater determinant, which ensures that if two fermions occupy the same state, the wave function becomes zero. This contrasts with bosons, which can occupy the same state without restriction. The explanation emphasizes the fundamental differences in behavior between fermions and bosons in quantum mechanics.
saray1360
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have always read the texts in which they have mentioned that for the electrons which are fermions the wave function should be antisymmetric, but I have not yet found a good proof for that.

In some books they have mentioned the pauli's exclusion principle and some relations, but still the concept is not clear to me. I hope you would kindly help me understand this matter.

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's quite simple. Assume you have a two-particle wave function \psi(r_1,r_2), where rx are the coordinates, including spin for the respective particles. What happens, or rather, what can happen to that wave function if the particles are interchanged? I.e. how does \Psi(r_1,r_2) relate to \Psi(r_2,r_1)? Well, if the two particles are indisinguishable, the two wave functions should be physically equivalent; identical with respect to all measurable properties. Which means the only difference is at most a difference in the phase of the wavefunction. We can write:
\Psi(r_1,r_2)=x\Psi(r_2,r_1)
where 'x' is a phase factor (e^i*w). Particle interchange is the equivalent of multiplying by 'x'.

If you change the particles back again, you multiply by x again. But obviously this is the same as our original wavefunction so:
\Psi(r_1,r_2)=x^2\Psi(r_1,r_2) and x^2 = 1.

So x = ±1. If x = 1, the wave function is symmetric with respect to particle interchange (\psi(r_1,r_2)=\psi(r_2,r_1)) then that's what's defined as a boson. Correspondingly if x = -1, the wave function is antisymmetric (\psi(r_1,r_2)=-\psi(r_2,r_1)) and that's what's called a fermion.

Now, if you form a multi-particle wave function in terms of single-particle wave functions, then it's a simple product in the case of bosons:
\Psi(r_1,r_2) = \psi_1(r_1)\psi_2(r_2)
The two particles have no problems being in the same state, since obviously if \psi_1=\psi_2 the condition \Psi(r_1,r_2)=\Psi(r_2,r_1) is still obeyed.

But this simple product wavefunction does not work for fermions since it doesn't follow the anti-symmetry condition. The simplest two-particle wave function that does, in terms of single-particle wave functions is:
\Psi(r_1,r_2)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1(r_1)\psi_2(r_2) - \psi_1(r_2)\psi_1(r_1))
(where the 1/sqrt(2) is for normalization)
More generally, for any number of particles, this takes the form of a Slater determinant.

This obeys the anti-symmetry condition, since swapping r1 and r2 leads to a sign change:
\psi_1(r_1)\psi_2(r_2) - \psi_1(r_2)\psi_2(r_1) = -(\psi_1(r_2)\psi_2(r_1) - \psi_1(r_1)\psi_2(r_2))

But can the particles be in the same state now? No. If \psi_1=\psi_2 then the two products are identical and the wave function becomes zero. This is the Pauli exclusion principle: Bosons can occupy the same states while having the same coordinates, Fermions can not.

(Now that I've spent my time writing an explanation that's already given in hundreds of textbooks, maybe it should be added to the PF "library"?)
 
  • Like
Likes shafque19 and hercules68
you can add the post in PF library if you want :-)

Also, please refer to some reference books and/or free additional web-references :-)
 
The sentences you have written about the pauli exclusion really made me feel and understand the antisymmetric nature of the wavefunctions for the fermions. Thanks so much for putting time on my answer.
 
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
702
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K