Any ideas about how to solve this problem involving fourier transforms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter enfield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Ideas
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation \(\dfrac{\mathcal{F}^{-1} \Big( \sqrt{\mathcal{F}(f(x))} \Big)}{f(x)} = g(x)\), where \(g(x) = x\). The goal is to determine \(f(x)\) given the relationship between the Fourier transform of \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\). Participants suggest exploring the integro-differential equation that describes \(f(x)\) and expanding the left-hand side using the inverse Fourier transform to facilitate solving for \(\mathcal{F}(f(x))\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with integro-differential equations
  • Knowledge of inverse Fourier transform techniques
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research integro-differential equations related to Fourier transforms
  • Learn about the properties of the inverse Fourier transform
  • Study methods for expanding and manipulating Fourier transform equations
  • Explore convolution operations in the context of Fourier transforms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier transforms, particularly those involved in signal processing or solving differential equations.

enfield
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
\dfrac{\mathcal{F}^{-1} \Big( \sqrt{\mathcal{F}(f(x))} \Big)}{f(x)} = g(x)<br /> <br />

g(x) is known, and for an example let's say g(x) is something simple like g(x) = x

so we have \mathcal{F}^{-1} \Big( \sqrt{\mathcal{F}(f(x))} \Big) = x \cdot f(x)

my question is, how do i find f(x)?

it's basically like you Fourier transform f(x), do something to it (in this case take the root), then inverse Fourier transform back to the original variable, and you want the new function to have a specified relationship to the old function (in this case have it be the old one multiplied by x).

one specific example of that kind of thing is Fourier transforming the function f(x), multiplying by another function, and then inverse Fourier transforming it back. There the new function is the convolution of f(x) and the function you multiplied the Fourier transform of f(x) by.

Any ideas? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey enfield.

Have you tried looking at the integro-differential equation that describes your function f(x)?

One suggestion is try and expand your LHS with the inverse Fourier transform as the integral involving the inverse tranform integral with the F of square root of x and then on the RHS you have f(x)g(x).

You can then differentiate both sides and the idea is to do it in such a way that gets rid of the integral and allows you to solve for F(f(x)) (i.e. the Fourier transform of f(x)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K