APC.5.2.01 AP Volume by Rotation

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ap Rotation Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the volume generated by rotating the curve defined by the function \(y=e^{-x}\) around the x-axis. The correct volume is determined using the formula \(V = \pi \int_0^\infty e^{-2x} \, dx\), resulting in \(V = \frac{\pi}{2}\). Participants noted a potential typo in the original problem statement, as the integrand \(e^{2x}\) leads to an unbounded volume, while \(e^{-2x}\) is bounded on the interval [0, ∞).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically improper integrals.
  • Familiarity with volume of revolution concepts in calculus.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties.
  • Ability to recognize and correct typographical errors in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of calculating volumes of solids of revolution using the disk method.
  • Learn about improper integrals and their convergence criteria.
  • Explore the properties of exponential decay functions, particularly \(e^{-x}\).
  • Review common mistakes in calculus, such as misidentifying functions in volume calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on volume calculations, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of function behavior in integration.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
006.png


$\displaystyle\pi\int_{0}^{\infty} e^x \ dx = \pi$

Ok I looked at some of the template equations but came up with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you'd have the correct answer if the integrand is \(e^{-x}\), but as given the volume is unbounded.
 
if the curve is $y=e^{-x}$ ...

$\displaystyle V = \pi \int_0^\infty e^{-2x} \, dx = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$
 
skeeter said:
if the curve is $y=e^{-x}$ ...

$\displaystyle V = \pi \int_0^\infty e^{-2x} \, dx = \dfrac{\pi}{2}$

Yes, I overlooked the squaring of the radius. :oops:
 
why is it negative?
 
karush said:
why is it negative?
It's a guess that the problem has a typo. The point is that [math]e^{-2x}[/math] is bounded on [math] [ 0, \infty )[/math] whereas [math]e^{2x}[/math] is not.

-Dan
 
karush said:
why is it negative?

compare the graphs in quadrant I ...

393FE634-9153-4CF7-981C-5CBA3AEDF622.png
393FE634-9153-4CF7-981C-5CBA3AEDF622.png
 
ok
glad you caught it
 
karush said:
ok
glad you caught it

I didn’t catch the incorrect function ... mark did. see post #2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K