Let's try the Moon. It's close and easy to photograph.
Even if the distances weren't printed on the picture, you could figure out that apogee is
x times further away than perigee. Don't know what those distances are, but you can still compare their relative sizes and relative distances.
Likewise, Kepler figured out the
relative distances of each planet (i.e. Mars is
x times further away from the Sun than Earth, etc).
You still have to calculate at least one actual distance. Once you do, you essentially know all the other distances you're interested in. Because we already knew the relative distances of each planet, and the shape of their orbit, once we figured out the distance between the Earth and Sun, we knew all the other distances were interested in for all of the planets known at that time.
In other words, comparing the images at apogee and perigee (or aphelion and perihelion) alone won't give you enough information. Somehow, you need to calculate a real distance; not just a relative distance.
So, if "and using helpful data" means measuring the distance between the Earth and Moon at apogee or perigee, then the images would enable you to measure the distance of the other. But you'd actually have to measure the distance somewhere.