Apostol definition of interior point and open set

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the definitions of interior points and open sets as presented in Apostol's work. Participants explore the implications of these definitions in the context of sets in \(\mathbb{R}^n\), including examples and potential misunderstandings related to the concepts of interior points and open sets.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines an interior point of a set \(S\) as a point \(a\) for which there exists an open \(n\)-ball centered at \(a\) that is entirely contained in \(S\).
  • Another participant challenges the initial definition of set \(S\), suggesting that it lacks clarity and implies that any set containing a ball \(B(a)\) would have all points in \(B(a)\) as interior points.
  • A different participant elaborates on the definition of interior points, emphasizing that a point is an interior point if a neighborhood around it is fully contained in the set.
  • Some participants question whether an open set can simply be defined as an open interval, providing examples of unions of intervals to illustrate the broader definition of open sets.
  • One participant points out that the interior of a set can contain multiple points, using the example of the interval \([0,10]\) to illustrate that its interior is \((0,10)\).
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the relationship between the definitions and the examples provided, particularly regarding the nature of open sets.
  • Several participants acknowledge the rigor of the material and the challenges faced by those new to the concepts, with some expressing encouragement for continued study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the definitions and examples of interior points and open sets. While some clarify and support each other's points, others express confusion or challenge the interpretations presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the definitions may depend on the specific context of the sets being discussed, and there are indications of missing assumptions or unclear definitions that contribute to the confusion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying calculus and analysis, particularly those grappling with the foundational concepts of topology in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and the definitions of open sets and interior points.

kahwawashay1
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
S is a set such that S\subseteqRn
point a is in S: a\inS

The point "a" is an interior point of S if there is an open n-ball with center "a", all of whose points belong to S.
ie., every interior point of S can be surrounded by an n-ball such that B(a)\subseteqS, where B(a) is the set of all points x in Rn such that ||x-a||<r (r is radius of the ball)

Ok so let's say we have such an S with point "a" and also containing all of the points in B(a).

Now, according to Apostol, the "interior" of S is the set of all interior points of S and is denoted by int S.
So let Q=int S for the S that I defined above. So, Q={a}, since "a" is the only interior point of S.

Now comes "open set"
A set W is an open set if all its points are interior points. ie., W is open set if and only if W = int W

This is what I don't understand. And actually, instead of "W", Apostol used S again, but I do not think he means any relation with the previous S's?
I know that an open set is basically an open interval, like (3, 4) on the x-axis would mean 3<x<4. So shouldn't an open set just be B(a)? Like in the case of S=(3, 4), S is an open set with interior point a=3.5, since 3.5 is the center, and B(a) is all x such that ||x-3.5||<0.5 ..but that means that S contains points other than just int S; namely, it also contains all points satisfying B(a), which are not interior points of S, so S≠int S


?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you did not define a set S. If you mean the statement that S is a set containing a ball B(a), although this does not define a set, still it implies that any such S has as interior points all of B(a).

going out on a limb here:
you are either just getting started or in over your head in apostol, or have a teacher who does not explain much.
 
Hopefully this will clear some stuff up.

Let S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n. A point x \in S[\itex] is called an <b>interior point</b> of S if <i>there exists</i> a number r &gt; 0 such that, whenever a \in \mathbb{R}^n is such that \Vert a - x \Vert &amp;lt; r, we have a \in S.<br /> <br /> To internalize this definition, let D_r(x) = \{a \in \mathbb{R}^n : \Vert a - x \Vert &amp;lt; r\} denote the collection of points within a fixed radius &quot;r&quot; (&gt; 0) of the point &quot;x&quot; in S. We can call sets of this form <b>open neighborhoods</b> (of x). In \mathbb{R}^2 this is the collection of points in the disk centered at x with radius r (but not on the circle). D<sub>r</sub>(x) is the set of points &quot;within r&quot; from x. Of course x \in D_r(x) for any r &gt; 0.<br /> <br /> If I can draw a circle around a point x \in \mathbb{R}^2 such that the entire circle is contained in S, then x is an interior point of S. In other words, an interior point of a set is a point around which I can draw a circle (of some arbitrary radius) completely contained in the set. Notice that a point outside my set can&#039;t have this property. Also notice that a point on the &quot;edge&quot; of my set can&#039;t be an interior point -- it seems that any circle centered at a point on the boundary would have a part lying outside the set. Draw a picture to see this! So when I say &quot;interior point&quot;, I mean a point truly on the &quot;inside&quot; (or &quot;interior&quot;) of the set.<br /> <br /> Notice that the definition of interior point of a set S is then x \in \mathbb{R}^n : (\exists r &amp;gt; 0 : D_r(x) \subseteq S). If every point in a set is an interior point of that set, then we call the set <b>open</b>.<br /> <br /> Now let the <b>interior</b> of S be denoted \mathrm{int} S = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : (\exists r &amp;gt; 0 : D_r(x) \subseteq S)\}. This is simply the collection of interior points of S. Now an open set is a set S for which S = int S. This means that <i>every</i> point in S is an interior point of S.<br /> <br /> In \mathbb{R}^n, open sets are precisely those which are unions of open neighborhoods.
 
kahwawashay1 said:
I know that an open set is basically an open interval, like (3, 4) on the x-axis would mean 3<x<4. So shouldn't an open set just be B(a)?

Little more to it than that. For example consider the union of (1,2) and (3,4). Is this an open set?

How about the union of (1,2), (3,4), (5,6), (7,8), ... which is a union of infinitely many disjoint intervals. Does it fit the definition of an open set?

Do you see how Apostol's definition covers these cases as well as the case of a simple interval?
 
You are misunderstanding int(S). Int(S) usually has more then one member. For example S = [0,10]. Then 1,2,3,7.8,pi etc are all in int(S). In fact int(S) = (0,10).
 
Dr. Seafood said:
Hopefully this will clear some stuff up.

Let S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n. A point x \in S[\itex] is called an <b>interior point</b> of S if <i>there exists</i> a number r &gt; 0 such that, whenever a \in \mathbb{R}^n is such that \Vert a - x \Vert &amp;lt; r, we have a \in S.<br /> <br /> To internalize this definition, let D_r(x) = \{a \in \mathbb{R}^n : \Vert a - x \Vert &amp;lt; r\} denote the collection of points within a fixed radius &quot;r&quot; (&gt; 0) of the point &quot;x&quot; in S. We can call sets of this form <b>open neighborhoods</b> (of x). In \mathbb{R}^2 this is the collection of points in the disk centered at x with radius r (but not on the circle). D<sub>r</sub>(x) is the set of points &quot;within r&quot; from x. Of course x \in D_r(x) for any r &gt; 0.<br /> <br /> If I can draw a circle around a point x \in \mathbb{R}^2 such that the entire circle is contained in S, then x is an interior point of S. In other words, an interior point of a set is a point around which I can draw a circle (of some arbitrary radius) completely contained in the set. Notice that a point outside my set can&#039;t have this property. Also notice that a point on the &quot;edge&quot; of my set can&#039;t be an interior point -- it seems that any circle centered at a point on the boundary would have a part lying outside the set. Draw a picture to see this! So when I say &quot;interior point&quot;, I mean a point truly on the &quot;inside&quot; (or &quot;interior&quot;) of the set.<br /> <br /> Notice that the definition of interior point of a set S is then x \in \mathbb{R}^n : (\exists r &amp;gt; 0 : D_r(x) \subseteq S). If every point in a set is an interior point of that set, then we call the set <b>open</b>.<br /> <br /> Now let the <b>interior</b> of S be denoted \mathrm{int} S = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : (\exists r &amp;gt; 0 : D_r(x) \subseteq S)\}. This is simply the collection of interior points of S. Now an open set is a set S for which S = int S. This means that <i>every</i> point in S is an interior point of S.<br /> <br /> In \mathbb{R}^n, open sets are precisely those which are unions of open neighborhoods.
<br /> <br /> thankss i get it now! :D
 
mathwonk said:
going out on a limb here:
you are either just getting started or in over your head in apostol, or have a teacher who does not explain much.

idk my class is called calculus I and II. but my teacher does more analysis stuff. not as deep as actual analysis tho, so i guess i am a bit in over my head lol
 
kahwawashay1 said:
idk my class is called calculus I and II. but my teacher does more analysis stuff. not as deep as actual analysis tho, so i guess i am a bit in over my head lol

you may be in over your head now, but starting out with this level of rigor will be incredibly amazing for you in the future, assuming you continue in mathematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K