Application of complex analysis to real integrals

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the integral of x^3/(e^x-1) from 0 to infinity. Participants debate the presence of singularities, with some asserting that there is a removable singularity at z=0, while others argue there are infinite simple poles. One suggested approach involves using a geometric series expansion for e^x, allowing the integral to be split and integrated term by term. The value of the integral is noted to be π^4/15, which relates to the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the nature of singularities in complex analysis for evaluating the integral.
jimlyn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


solve integral x^3/(e^x-1) with limits from 0 to infinity


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i tried using a rectangular contour,the boundaries of the contour pass through z=0 but the complex equivalent has pole at z=0. by Cauchy theorem the function must be analytic even at the boundaries.how do i tackle this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, are you sure that's the correct integral? It has no singularities and no poles. Can you be more specific about what you are trying to do?
 
Last edited:
If I remember well this integral is from Stefan - Boltzman law. It's value is \frac{\pi^4}{15}. Put e^x in form of the series, use some approximation and you must in the and get Riman zeta function.
 
Amok, it actually has an infinite number of simple poles. You may want to recheck your thinking.

jimlyn - There is no pole at z=0. There is a removable singularity, and using in the theory of analytic functions, if there is ever a removable singularity we assume it is already redefined such that it is now analytic at that point.

Nevertheless, if you want to dodge a pole that's blocking your path, just go around it. Indent your path with a little semi-circle going around the pole, and take the limit as the radius of that semi circle tends to zero.

We can avoid contour integration all together, by noting 0 < e^{-x} < 1 in (0,\infty), so we can expand as a geometric series like this:

\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^3}{e^x-1} dx = \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^3 e^{-x} }{1-e^{-x} } dx = \int^{\infty}_0 \left( x^3 e^{-x} + x^3 e^{-2x} + x^3 e^{-3x} + \cdots \right) dx

We can split up the integral and integrate each term individually (justified by Lebesgue's Monotone convergence theorem). Hopefully the rest is simple.
 
Gib Z said:
Amok, it actually has an infinite number of simple poles. You may want to recheck your thinking.

jimlyn - There is no pole at z=0. There is a removable singularity, and using in the theory of analytic functions, if there is ever a removable singularity we assume it is already redefined such that it is now analytic at that point.

Nevertheless, if you want to dodge a pole that's blocking your path, just go around it. Indent your path with a little semi-circle going around the pole, and take the limit as the radius of that semi circle tends to zero.

We can avoid contour integration all together, by noting 0 < e^{-x} < 1 in (0,\infty), so we can expand as a geometric series like this:

\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^3}{e^x-1} dx = \int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^3 e^{-x} }{1-e^{-x} } dx = \int^{\infty}_0 \left( x^3 e^{-x} + x^3 e^{-2x} + x^3 e^{-3x} + \cdots \right) dx

We can split up the integral and integrate each term individually (justified by Lebesgue's Monotone convergence theorem). Hopefully the rest is simple.

I didn't really understand what he meant, I read the integral as:

\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{x^3}{e^{x-1}} dx

My bad.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K