Applying Kirchhoff's Laws to Solve Circuit Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Masterx00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 3K views
Masterx00
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find I1,I2,I3

Homework Equations



Attached the circuit diagram

2. The attempt at a solution

I1 - I2 + I3 = 0

-120I1 - 60I2 + 0I3 = -1.8

0I1 -60I2 -20I3 = -1.2

I1 = 1/150 A

I2 = 1/60 A

I3 = 1/100 A

Is that correct ? The answer is my textbook is different :(
 

Attachments

  • k1.jpg
    k1.jpg
    6.5 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks :)
I took the 1st loop clockwise and the second loop anticlockwise, so why the 1st equation is wrong then ?
Can you please explain further ? :)
 
Masterx00 said:
Thanks :)
I took the 1st loop clockwise and the second loop anticlockwise, so why the 1st equation is wrong then ?
Can you please explain further ? :)

Your 1st equation (I1 - I2 + I3 = 0) doesn't involve loops, it's for a vertex, so it only involves "in" or "out".

According to the diagram, I1 is in, and both I2 and I3 are out. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Your 1st equation (I1 - I2 + I3 = 0) doesn't involve loops, it's for a vertex, so it only involves "in" or "out".

According to the diagram, I1 is in, and both I2 and I3 are out. :smile:

But, If I made it I1 - I2 - I3 = 0, I1 = 0, I2 = 0.03, I3=-0.03, that sounds correct ?
 
Kirchhoff's first law says that the current into a juction is equal to the juntion out. So use that on the top middle junction and have another think about that first question (remembering the directions of currents!)

Could I also ask if the current directions were given or if you chose them?
 
tiny-tim said:
No … how did you get that? :confused:

By substituting it with the other 2 equations (using the calculator eqn solver):
I1 - I2 - I3 = 0

-120I1 - 60I2 + 0I3 = -1.8

0I1 -60I2 -20I3 = -1.2
 
aha
Now it gives correct answer (0.02,-0.01,0.03), I though direction of I3 was same like I1, because of the direction of the drawn battery poles :shy:
Thanks for help tiny-tim :smile: