Applying Stokes' Theorem in Spherical Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter BiGyElLoWhAt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Stokes' Theorem in spherical coordinates, specifically for the region defined by the equation \(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 64\). The user is attempting to convert the vector field \(F = \langle x, -y, z \rangle\) into spherical coordinates and is unsure how to define the function \(g\) and its partial derivatives. The conversation highlights the need for proper substitutions and understanding of the spherical coordinate system to effectively apply Stokes' Theorem in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' Theorem
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and transformations
  • Familiarity with vector fields and partial derivatives
  • Experience with multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert vector fields into spherical coordinates
  • Study the derivation and application of Stokes' Theorem in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the concept of divergence and curl in spherical coordinates
  • Practice solving integrals involving spherical regions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus, particularly those preparing for exams or needing to apply Stokes' Theorem in spherical coordinates.

BiGyElLoWhAt
Gold Member
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
138
OK, so I know stokes theorem states that I can turn ##\int \int_{S}F\cdot dS## into ##\int \int (-P\frac{\partial g(x,y)}{\partial x} -Q\frac{\partial g(x,y)}{\partial y} + R)dxdy##

but I have a problem that I'm working on that's screaming change of variables (to spherical), but I'm not sure if I can apply stokes' this way...

my region is ##x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 64##, and I really want to make my region a spherical region (if possible, as I need to understand this for my final) but I'm not sure how to define g.

What's throwing me off is which partials to take. My F is ##<x,-y,z>## and upon making the proper substitutions, ##- \rho <cos(\theta )sin(\phi ), -sin(\theta )sin(\phi ), cos(\ phi)>##
and I suppose g would be ##\rho <cos(\theta )sin(\phi ), sin(\theta )sin(\phi ), cos(\ phi)>## , since that's my region? It's the region in the first quadrant oriented inwards, that's where the negative sign came from, I guess it should probably be in g, but either way it's going make it into the integral.

But now, how do I define my g and my partials? I understand P is my ##\hat{i}## and Q j and R z, but I'm uncertain as to which partials I'm multiplying by which functions.

I'm not sure if I can even do this, I'm just trying to understand this better. any help would be greatly appreciated =]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I didn't want to, but I watched the "how to" video, which basically works through the problem, and they ended up solving "g" for z, but I'm still wondering if there is a way to do this in spherical? Or do I need ##F = P\hat{\theta} + Q \hat{\phi} + R \hat{\rho}## in order to make this work like I'm wanting it to?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K