Approximate value of ##E=1/2! +1/3!+1/4!+... ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlemathquark
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
littlemathquark
Messages
204
Reaction score
26
User has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork type problems.
Homework Statement
##n\in \mathbb{Z^+}## and given ##1/n! > 1/(n+1)! +1/(n+2)!+...##
find the approximate value of ##E=1/2! +1/3!+1/4!+... ##
Relevant Equations
##n\in \mathbb{Z^+}## and if we know ##1/n! > 1/(n+1)! +1/(n+2)!+...##
find the approximate value of ##E=1/2! +1/3!+1/4!+... ##
I know ##1+1/1!+1/2!+1/3!+...=e=2,71.. ## but I have to find approximate value of E using inequality.
 
on Phys.org
The following are the test choices
0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
 
berkeman said:
Then you need to show more effort. We do not take your math tests for you.
I know but I need an idea.
 
Thank you but I dont know that theorem but I found this idea
İt's clear E>0,5

E<1/2! +1/2!
E<(1/2! +1/3!)+1/3!
E<(1/2!+1/3! +1/4!)+1/4!
E<(1/2!+1/3! +1/4!+1/5!)+1/5!
 
E<(1/2!) +1/2!=1 and added number 1/2!=0,5
E<(1/2! +1/3!)+1/3!=5/6=0,83 and added number 1/3!=0,16
E<(1/2!+1/3! +1/4!)+1/4!=3/4=0,75 and added number 1/4!=0,04

It can be said that after this stage, since the numbers added will be very small, the number E approaches 0.7 by decreasing.
 
WWGD said:
Well, ##1/2^n## is a lower bound for ##n \geq 1##, though hardly a tight one. Edit: Thus ## 1+1/2+...+1/2^n+...=2*## would be a lower bound, albeit obviously not too tight.

*Converging to, as n grows.
İs ##1/2^n## is a lower bound or upper bound?
 
littlemathquark said:
İs ##1/2^n## is a lower bound or upper bound?
Edit: My bad, I realize I misread; let me delete it. This is my idea: As a loweer bound, add the first 10 terms ##1+(1/2!)+...+(1/10!)## and then use a geometric progression starting with ##(1/11!)## and common ratio ##(1/11)##,

Then we have the bound ##1+(1/2!)+....+(1/10!)+ (1/39916800)[\frac{1}{1-(1/11)}##.]
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: littlemathquark
WWGD said:
My bad, I realize I misread; let me delete it. This is my idea: As an upper bound, add the first 10 terms ##1+(1/2!)+...+(1/10!)## and then use a geometric progression starting with ##(1/11!)## and common ratio ##(1/11)##,

Then we have the bound ##1+(1/2!)+....+(1/10!)+ (1/39916800)[\frac{1}{1-(1/11)}##.]
Screenshot_20250321_104229_Samsung Internet.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250321_110126_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20250321_110126_Samsung Internet.jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 63
Last edited:
the given inequality is an upper bound for the error in approximating E by its first n-1 terms.

Unfortunately, use of a small hand held calculator also introduced, for me, roundoff error. My computation of the first 12 terms gave me .718281829, which should have been an underestimate, with error less than 1/13!, but is obviously an overestimate in the last digit.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and SammyS