Approximating unsolvable recursion relations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoplite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recursion Relations
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
Hoplite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I have a complicated recursion replation, which I'm sure is unsolvable. (By "unsolvable" I mean that there is no closed form solution expressing [tex]\xi_1[/tex], [tex]\xi_2[/tex], [tex]\xi_3[/tex], etc. in terms of [tex]\xi_0[/tex].) It goes

[tex]\frac{(k+4)!}{k!}\xi_{k+4} +K_1 (k+2)(k+1)\xi_{k+2}+ [ K_2 k(k-1) +K_3] \xi_{k} +K_4 \xi_{k-2} =0,[/tex]

for [tex]k=0,1,2,3...[/tex], where [tex]K_1[/tex], [tex]K_2[/tex], [tex]K_3[/tex] and [tex]K_4[/tex] are constants. However, what I do know about the [tex]\xi_k[/tex]'s is that

[tex]\sum_{k_{even}} \xi_{k}=\sum_{k_{odd}} \xi_k=1,[/tex]

and that

[tex]\sum_{k_{even}}k \xi_{k}=\sum_{k_{odd}}k \xi_k=0.[/tex]

[tex]\xi_k[/tex] is also zero for all [tex]k<0[/tex]. What I want to do is produce an approximation of the sum for

[tex]S(z) =\sum_{k=0}^\infty \xi_k z^k.[/tex]

Does anyone have any idea how to do this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly that type of recursion relation is solvable. Somehow you take differences of consecutive equations until you have
[tex]\sum_1^N a_i\xi_{k+i}=0[/tex]
and then you use a geometric series as the trial solution. Not sure if the degree of that polynomial becomes too large.

But maybe the contraints help.
 
Hoplite said:
[tex]\sum_{k_{even}} \xi_{k}=\sum_{k_{odd}} \xi_k=1,[/tex]
What do you mean? Isn't S=2 then?
 
Gerenuk said:
What do you mean? Isn't S=2 then?
Oops, sorry. I had the wrong equation for S. I've fixed it now.
 
Using something which I think is called z-transform you get
[tex]S''''+(a+bx^2)S''+(c+dx^2)S=e_5x^5+\dotsb+e_0[/tex]
I guess that's your initial problem in reverse :)
Anyone knows how to solve this? I've found
http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/ode/ode0406.pdf
but that only works for a special contraints on the parameters.
 
Last edited:
This series will converge really quickly - this is definitely an entire function. It's probably just as good to deal with the recursive relation. Even if you had a closed form, it wouldn't help you to evaluate the function.

Do you need a closed form, or do you just think you need it? For the purpose of it being a solution to an ODE, this is just as good.
 
Gerenuk said:
Using something which I think is called z-transform you get
[tex]S''''+(a+bx^2)S''+(c+dx^2)S=e_5x^5+\dotsb+e_0[/tex]
I guess that's your initial problem in reverse :)
That's correct. In fact my equation is

[tex]S''''+(a+bx^2)S''+(c+dx^2)S=0,[/tex]

with some inhomogenious boundary conditions.
 
Sorry for messing around and confusing people :)
But maybe the special case from that webpage helps a bit :)