Approximating Damped Oscillator Time Period and Frequency with Large n

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on approximating the time period and frequency of a damped oscillator after a large number of oscillations, specifically when the amplitude drops to 1/e of its original value. For part (a), the derived relationship shows that the ratio of the damped period to the undamped period is approximately 1 plus a small correction term, which is clarified through the use of square root approximations. In part (b), the frequency ratio is similarly approximated, indicating that the damped frequency is slightly less than the undamped frequency. The conversation highlights the importance of applying mathematical approximations for small values in deriving these relationships. Overall, the thread provides insights into the behavior of damped oscillators in physics.
Allan McPherson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An oscillator when undamped has a time period T0, while its time period when damped. Suppose after n oscillations the amplitude of the damped oscillator drops to 1/e of its original value (value at t = 0).

(a) Assuming that n is a large number, show that $$\frac{T}{T_0}=\left (1+\frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}\right) \approx 1 + \frac{1}{8n^2\pi^2}$$
(b) Assuming that n is a large number, show that $$\frac{\omega}{\omega_0} \approx 1 - \frac{1}{8n^2\pi^2}$$

Homework Equations


$$x(t) = A e^{-\gamma t}cos(\omega t + \phi)$$
$$T = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega}$$
$$\omega = \sqrt{\omega_0^2 - \gamma^2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I've managed to get the equality for both parts. We want $$\frac{A}{e} = A e^{-\gamma t}cos(\omega t + \phi)$$
which is only true if
##\gamma n T = 1,## ##\omega n T = 2n\pi## and ##\phi = 2m\pi##​
which implies $$T = \frac{1}{\gamma n} = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}$$
So $$\omega_0 = \gamma\sqrt{1 + 4n^2\pi^2}$$
And
$$\frac{T}{T_0} = \frac{\omega_0}{\omega}=\frac{\gamma\sqrt{1+4n^2\pi^2}}{2n\pi\gamma}$$ $$=\frac{\sqrt{1+4n^2\pi^2}}{4n^2\pi^2} = \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2} \right )^{1/2}$$
The answer to part (b) will clearly involve taking the inverse of the right-hand side of the equality and applying the same or a similar approximation.

I know I've seen this approximation before, but I can't for the life of me remember how it works. l would appreciate any help that can be offered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allan McPherson said:

Homework Statement



An oscillator when undamped has a time period T0, while its time period when damped ?. Suppose after n oscillations the amplitude of the damped oscillator drops to 1/e of its original value (value at t = 0).

(a) Assuming that n is a large number, show that $$\frac{T}{T_0}=\left (1+\frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}\right) \approx 1 + \frac{1}{8n^2\pi^2}$$
You miss a square root:
$$\frac{T}{T_0}=\sqrt{\left (1+\frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}\right)} \approx 1 + \frac{1}{8n^2\pi^2}$$

If x << 1,
##\sqrt{1+x}=\sqrt{(1+x/2)^2-(x/2)^2 }\approx \sqrt{(1+x/2)^2}=1+x/2##

Also ##\frac{1}{1+x}## is the sum of the geometric series 1-x+x^2-x^3+..., approximately 1-x if x << 1.
 
Allan McPherson said:
$$=\frac{\sqrt{1+4n^2\pi^2}}{4n^2\pi^2} = \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2} \right )^{1/2}$$
You meant
$$=\sqrt{\frac{1+4n^2\pi^2}{4n^2\pi^2}} = \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2} \right )^{1/2}$$
 
Thank you. That clarifies the approximation for part (a). I'm not sure how that helps with part (b), though.

For part (b) I have $$\frac{\omega}{\omega_0} = \frac{2n\pi}{\sqrt{1+4n^2\pi^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{4n^2\pi^2}{1+4n^2\pi^2}} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}}$$
 
Last edited:
Allan McPherson said:
Thank you. That clarifies the approximation for part (a). I'm not sure how that helps with part (b), though.

For part (b) I have $$\frac{\omega}{\omega_0} = \frac{2n\pi}{\sqrt{1+4n^2\pi^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{4n^2\pi^2}{1+4n^2\pi^2}} = \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}}$$
Let be ##x=-\frac{1}{4n^2\pi^2}## . |x|<<1, apply the approxiamation for the square root as in Post #2.
 
Last edited:
Right. Looking at that again, I'm not sure how I thought that could be right. Thank you for your help.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
971
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
997
Replies
5
Views
868
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K