Archimedes's principle of float

  • Thread starter Thread starter justaus3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Float Principle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a swimming pool with a layer of ice floating on its surface, supporting a rock. The task is to calculate the change in water height when the ice melts and the rock falls. The context relates to fluid mechanics, specifically Archimedes' principle and buoyancy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the rock's weight, the ice's buoyancy, and the resulting water displacement. Some question the relevance of Archimedes' principle to the problem, while others explore the implications of the ice melting and the rock's immersion.

Discussion Status

There are various interpretations of the problem's requirements and the role of the ice. Some participants have provided calculations related to the height change, while others are clarifying concepts and assumptions. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the thickness of the ice and its area, which may affect the calculations. The assumption that the ice's thickness is negligible is also mentioned.

justaus3r
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A swimming pool with 5 M length and 4 M width.A big layer of ice floats on the surface of the pool and above the layer of ice a rock with 40 KG mass and 5 R.D.,If the ice is melted and the rock fall, calculate the change in the height of water in the pool

final answer (1.6 * 10^-3 m)

Homework Equations


F_b (upthrust force) = ρ_water * volume_immersed * gravity


The Attempt at a Solution


i tried by getting the volume of the displaced liquid as it equals the upthrust force and then divide it by the area to get the height of the displaced liquid but the answer is wrong. i think we should include the ice as it melted but it didn't give any info. about it though
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem has nothing to do with Archimedes' Principle.

But you are right the thickness of ice is assumed to be negligible.
 
justaus3r said:

Homework Statement


A swimming pool with 5 M length and 4 M width.A big layer of ice floats on the surface of the pool and above the layer of ice a rock with 40 KG mass and 5 R.D.,If the ice is melted and the rock fall, calculate the change in the height of water in the pool

final answer (1.6 * 10^-3 m)

Homework Equations


F_b (upthrust force) = ρ_water * volume_immersed * gravity

The Attempt at a Solution


i tried by getting the volume of the displaced liquid as it equals the upthrust force and then divide it by the area to get the height of the displaced liquid but the answer is wrong. i think we should include the ice as it melted but it didn't give any info. about it though
Hello justaus3r. Welcome to PF !

What is R.D. ?

Relative Density ?


Does the height of the water increase, or does it decrease ?
 
paisiello2 said:
This problem has nothing to do with Archimedes' Principle.

But you are right the thickness of ice is assumed to be negligible.
This problem has everything to do with Archimedes' Principle .
 
Your calculation is almost correct. It correctly computes the level rise due to the rock on top of the ice. When the ice melts, the rock doesn't vanish in thin air. It goes to the bottom where it still affects the water level, but the amount of water level rise is different than before. Compute the difference.
 
SammyS said:
This problem has everything to do with Archimedes' Principle .
Yes, I see you are right now.
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
Hello justaus3r. Welcome to PF !

What is R.D. ?

Relative Density ?


Does the height of the water increase, or does it decrease ?

yes R.D. is relative density = Density of material / density of water

it increases
 
paisiello2 said:
This problem has nothing to do with Archimedes' Principle.

But you are right the thickness of ice is assumed to be negligible.

archimedes' principle includes cases where opposing force(s) has higher value than upthrust force which leads to the sinking of the body
 
dauto said:
Your calculation is almost correct. It correctly computes the level rise due to the rock on top of the ice. When the ice melts, the rock doesn't vanish in thin air. It goes to the bottom where it still affects the water level, but the amount of water level rise is different than before. Compute the difference.

thanks in advance for helping but unfortunately i don't have the height of water in the pool
 
  • #10
justaus3r said:
thanks in advance for helping but unfortunately i don't have the height of water in the pool .
You don't need the height of water in the pool. you just need to find out how much it changes.
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
You don't need the height of water in the pool. you just need to find out how much it changes.

Ok, as for the ice part should i include it or i can't bec. i don't have its area ?
 
  • #12
justaus3r said:
Ok, as for the ice part should i include it or i can't bec. i don't have its area ?
Consider an ice cube floating in a glass of water.

How much water does it displace?


When it melts, what is the weight of the (liquid) water that the melted ice becomes?
 
  • #13
SammyS said:
Consider an ice cube floating in a glass of water.

How much water does it displace?


When it melts, what is the weight of the (liquid) water that the melted ice becomes?

it displaces amount of water equals to the upthrust force acting on ice from surface of water

I think it remains the same (am not sure though )
 
  • #14
justaus3r said:
it displaces amount of water equals to the upthrust force acting on ice from surface of water

I think it remains the same (am not sure though )
The ice cube displaces an amount of water equal to the weight of the ice cube.

When the ice cube melts the weight of the water it yields is equal to the weight of the water it used to displace.
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
The ice cube displaces an amount of water equal to the weight of the ice cube.

When the ice cube melts the weight of the water it yields is equal to the weight of the water it used to displace.

their masses are equal but their volumes aren't equal, right ?
 
  • #16
Area = 20 m^(2)
Before melting
I think i solved it but correct me if i am wrong
if the height increased due to floatation of that ice layer with the body equals 2 * 10 ^(-3) m
since the body is floating therefore the M_body*g = ρ_water * vol._immersed * g
vol_immersed = M_body / ρ_water = 40 / 1000 = 4 * 10 ^(-2) then V = A * h, h = V / A
equals 4 * 10 ^ -2 / 20, therefore h = 2 * 10 ^(-3) m

since the ice had melted and the body fall
weight of water displaced = upthrust force
M * g = volume of body * ρ_water *g
M * g = 8 * 10 ^(-3) * 1000 * g
M = 8 Kg
volume of water = 8 / 1000 = 8 * 10(^-3) m^3
height = 8 * 10 ^(-3) / 20 = 4 * 10 ^(-4) m


change in height = 2 * 10^(-3) - 4 * 10^(-4) = 1.6 * 10 ^(-3) m
 
  • #17
justaus3r said:
Area = 20 m^(2)
Before melting
I think i solved it but correct me if i am wrong
if the height increased due to floatation of that ice layer with the body equals 2 * 10 ^(-3) m
since the body is floating therefore the M_body*g = ρ_water * vol._immersed * g
vol_immersed = M_body / ρ_water = 40 / 1000 = 4 * 10 ^(-2) then V = A * h, h = V / A
equals 4 * 10 ^ -2 / 20, therefore h = 2 * 10 ^(-3) m

since the ice had melted and the body fall
weight of water displaced = upthrust force
M * g = volume of body * ρ_water *g
M * g = 8 * 10 ^(-3) * 1000 * g
M = 8 Kg
volume of water = 8 / 1000 = 8 * 10(^-3) m^3
height = 8 * 10 ^(-3) / 20 = 4 * 10 ^(-4) m


change in height = 2 * 10^(-3) - 4 * 10^(-4) = 1.6 * 10 ^(-3) m


Is the final height lower or higher then the initial height?

The change of height is the final height - initial height. You subtracted the final height from the initial one, so got wrong sign for the change. Otherwise, it is correct.

ehild
 
  • #18
ehild said:
Is the final height lower or higher then the initial height?

The change of height is the final height - initial height. You subtracted the final height from the initial one, so got wrong sign for the change. Otherwise, it is correct.

ehild

I supposed that the change in height = height_big - height_small
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
799
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K