Are All Electrons Created Equal? The Implications of Quantum Field Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter catamongpigeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Click For Summary
Electrons are considered identical particles in quantum mechanics, meaning they cannot be distinguished by their intrinsic properties. This indistinguishability leads to the requirement of anti-symmetrization of their wave functions, which is essential for phenomena like the Pauli exclusion principle. If electrons were not identical, the fundamental structure of atoms would be significantly altered. The discussion raises questions about whether an emitted electron is the same as a detected one, emphasizing that such distinctions are meaningless due to their indistinguishable nature. Overall, the assumption that all electrons share identical characteristics is crucial for understanding quantum mechanics and atomic behavior.
  • #31
Except... It might change the momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Jilang said:
Except... It might change the momentum?

Except it must be conserved.
 
  • #33
craigi said:
Except it must be conserved.

Mmmm, doesn't the uncertainty in the momentum increase with time or am I getting that bit wrong?
 
  • #34
Jilang said:
Mmmm, doesn't the uncertainty in the momentum increase with time or am I getting that bit wrong?

Are you talking about the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
 
  • #35
I'm talking about the diffusion type process described by the Schroedinger equation.
 
  • #36
doesn't the uncertainty in the momentum increase with time or am I getting that bit wrong?

Measurements always show a statistical distribution.
 
  • #37
Jilang said:
Do we know if the electron that is emitted is the same one that is detected?
This is a meaningless question for identical particles such as electrons.
 
  • #38
atyy said:
If they were not identical, this anti-symmetrization would not be required. This anti-symmetrization leads to things like the Pauli exclusion principle which has experimental consequences.

What do you think are the most striking experimental consequences?
 
  • #39
ddd123 said:
What do you think are the most striking experimental consequences?
Now that's an open-ended question :)
The Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the behavior of electrons around the nucleus, and this in turn is responsible for just about all the behavior of matter: chemistry, solidity, density, ... Without the exclusion principle, EVERYTHING would be unimaginably different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes bhobba and zonde
  • #40
Are all electrons equal?

Yes, but some are more equal than others.

Quarks of England, quarks of Ireland,
Quarks of every land and clime,
Hearken to my joyful tidings
Of the Golden future time.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #41
The idea of particles as these individual entities is superseded by quantum field theory, in the second quantization. It doesn't really make sense to think of two electrons as separate things, since they are both excitations of an underlying electron field. The only way for two electrons to have different properties is for there to be multiple different electron fields. In which case, we would not call them both electrons. For example, we call an electron-like object with higher mass a muon.

Bad analogy time: if I have two cents in my bank account, I can transfer them one at a time, but there's no way to distinguish one cent from the other cent since they are just numbers in a computer, not physical pennies.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
810
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K