Are all Killing Vectors in 2D Spacetime Hypersurface Orthogonal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In a (1+1) spacetime, all Killing vectors (KVs) are indeed hypersurface orthogonal. This conclusion is supported by the property that in two dimensions, a vector field possesses a unique orthogonal direction, allowing for the integration of a curve from a starting point to visualize the orthogonal hypersurface. The discussion confirms that if the hypersurface orthogonality condition is satisfied, the spacetime is classified as stationary. This understanding is crucial for solving related exam questions effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Killing vectors in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with (1+1) dimensional Lorentzian metrics
  • Knowledge of hypersurface orthogonality conditions
  • Ability to perform coordinate transformations in spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Killing vectors in 2D spacetimes
  • Learn about hypersurface orthogonality conditions in general relativity
  • Explore coordinate transformations and their effects on vector fields
  • Investigate the implications of stationary spacetimes in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in general relativity, physicists studying spacetime symmetries, and mathematicians interested in differential geometry.

cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Messages
8,145
Reaction score
75
Just a quick question. Suppose we are considering a (1+1) spacetime. Are all vector fields hypersurface orthogonal? I think the answer is yes, since in the formula [tex]\xi_{[a}\partial_b \xi_{c]}[/tex], two indices will always be the same, which I think automatically makes the expression equal to zero, but am just seeking clarification!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct. In 2d, a vector field has a 'pretty unique' orthogonal direction (up to direction reversal). So use that orthogonal direction to integrate a curve from a starting point. That curve is the orthogonal 'hypersurface'. So you can visualize it geometrically as well.
 
Thanks, Dick. It's just this question I'm doing on an old exam paper. I've found a killing vector, and transformed into new coordinates so that it is of the form d/dt. The question then asks 'is this spacetime static'. Since the 2d metric is lorentzian, d/dt is clearly timelike => stationary. Then I calculated the hypersurface orthogaonality equation and saw that it was clearly satisfied, thus the spacetime is stationary, then thought about the situation and conjectured that all KV's in 2d are hypersurface orthogonal.

I just wanted to know I was right really, since this question will be on the exam, and saw this is a nice shortcut.

Anyway, thanks again for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K