Are All Points Collinear in This Week's University POTW?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem presented in this week's University Problem of the Week (POTW) involves a finite number of points in space, where any line containing two of these points also contains a third. The conclusion drawn from the discussion is that all points must be collinear. This is established through geometric reasoning and proofs that demonstrate the necessity of collinearity under the given conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometric principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of collinearity in mathematics
  • Knowledge of proof techniques in geometry
  • Ability to analyze spatial relationships between points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of collinear points in Euclidean geometry
  • Explore geometric proof techniques, such as direct proof and contradiction
  • Investigate the implications of collinearity in higher dimensions
  • Learn about related concepts like affine spaces and linear dependence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, educators teaching geometric concepts, and students preparing for mathematical competitions.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's problem:

-----

You are given a finite number of points in space with the property that any line that contains two of these points contains three of them. What must be true of all the points? Prove it.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's University POTW. Here is my solution:

All the points must be collinear. We proceed by contradiction. (We assume there are more than some minimum number of points.) Suppose there are two points, $A$ and $B$ on a line. Because the number of points is finite, we will suppose that there is one point, $D$, not on the line, whose distance to the line is a minimum. Now the line $AB$, by hypothesis, must have a third point on it, call it $C$. Consider the distance from $D$ to $AB$, and call it $d_{\min}$. Now consider the "point" Q on $AB$ such that $QD=d_{\min}$. I use quotes, because $Q$ may not be a point in the geometry. At least two of $A,B,C$ must lie on the same side of $Q$, or possibly one of them coincides with it. WLOG, we assume $A$ and $C$ lie on the same side of the line with respect to $Q$. Draw the line $DA$. Then the distance from $C$ to $DA$ must be strictly less than $d_{\min}$, because it is less than or equal to the distance from $Q$ to $DA$, which is strictly less than $d_{\min}$. This contradicts the minimality of $d_{\min}$, hence there is no such minimum distance, and all the points must be collinear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K