Are I(nu, T) and I(lamda, T) Equivalent in Planck's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicktacik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Planck's law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equivalence of the spectral radiance formulas I(nu, T) and I(lamda, T) as presented in Planck's Law of black body radiation. I(nu, T) is defined as spectral radiance per unit frequency with units of W/m²/Hz, while I(lamda, T) is defined as spectral radiance per unit wavelength with units of J/s/m³. The confusion arises from the differing units, which represent distinct physical quantities, emphasizing the importance of understanding the definitions and contexts of each formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law of black body radiation
  • Familiarity with spectral radiance concepts
  • Knowledge of unit conversions in physics
  • Basic grasp of frequency and wavelength relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Planck's Law
  • Study the relationship between frequency and wavelength in electromagnetic radiation
  • Learn about the implications of spectral radiance in thermodynamics
  • Explore unit conversion techniques in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and electromagnetic radiation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Planck's Law.

nicktacik
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
On the wikipeida page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law_of_black_body_radiation

two formula's are given for spectral radiance, I(nu, T) and I(lamda,T). However, I(nu, T) seems to have units of J/m^2 and I(lamda, T) seems to have units of J/s/m^3. My homework question is to show that these expression are equivalent, however the fact that the units don't work boggles my mind. Does each expression represent something different? Can someone please shed some light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember the definitions.
Remember that for example I(nu,T) gives a density with respect to the frequency scale. The units you have indicated could be seen in another light: W/m²/Hz. I like the "/Hz" units! It is convenient to think that: I(nu,T)*d(nu)*Surface is a power.

Observe that using the same notations for I(nu, T) and I(lamda,T) is not really a good idea because these are different functions, but it is common practice.
 
Oh, so I(nu, T) is really I per unit frequency and I(lamda, T) is really I per unit wavelength?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K