News Are Iraqi Children Being Freed from Political Imprisonment by US Marines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alias
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Children
AI Thread Summary
U.S. Marines from Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, entered the northeastern suburbs of Baghdad on April 8, 2003, receiving a warm welcome from local Iraqis, who expressed their support by chanting for America and President Bush. The Marines facilitated the release of over 160 children from a prison, reportedly held for refusing to join Saddam Hussein's youth political party. Discussions in the thread shifted to casualty figures, with conflicting reports on civilian and military deaths. While Abu Dhabi TV cited over 1,200 civilian deaths, the accuracy of these numbers was questioned, particularly since many sources were linked to Iraqi state media. Participants debated the classification of government employees as combatants and speculated on the number of Iraqi military casualties, with estimates ranging widely. The conversation highlighted the challenges in obtaining reliable casualty data amidst the chaos of war.
Alias
5th Marines enter Baghdad suburbs

WITH THE FIFTH MARINES, Iraq, April 8 (UPI) -- U.S. Marines rolled into northeastern suburbs of Baghdad Tuesday where thousands of cheering Iraqis yelled, "America, America, America," and "Bush, Bush, Bush." The Marines, led by Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, entered the area after fording a tributary of the Tigris River. Iraqis held up children, waved white flags and showed no hostile intent. The sincerity of their emotions was unquestionable. The crescendo of welcome increased as an Iraqi woman led the Marines to a children's prison where than more than 160 youngsters were freed.

I 'heard' that the reason they were imprisoned was because they refused to join some branch of Saddam's political party for youth. I also 'heard' that some had been in prison for as long as five years.

These are Iraqi children.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
This quoted from cnn.com

"Iraq has not released details of military casualties. Abu Dhabi TV, quoting official Iraqi sources, reported that 1,252 civilians have been killed and 5,103 wounded. CNN cannot independently verify those figures."

These number seem to jive well with the following count...

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

And also the 120+ coalition casualties. You can see them here...

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/index.html

Anyone seen estimates on the number of Iraqi combatant casualties?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by Alias
These number seem to jive well with the following count...
One BIG problem with that site, Alias. Notice how the max and min mumbers are so close together (usually identical)? Thats because virtually *ALL* of the reports have one source: Iraqi state TV. And notice Iraqi state TV isn't listed as a news outlet.

I wonder: does Iraqi state tv differentiate between civilans killed by the coalition and civilians they killed themselves? Such as the civilians shelled and shot in Basra?

Also, that doesn't separate out government employees. I'm making an assumption here, but it would appear they are considered civilians. But a government employee (yes, even the janitor) is a combatant.
 
Russ, I agree you 100% about the iraqbodycount.net site. But I don't know about classifying govt employees as "combatants"... since I work for a state university, that would make me a combatant, too, wouldn't it? Hmm.
 
Well if those numbers are inflated, then the news is better. It still seems like relatively small numbers considering how much damage has been inflicted, and the goals of the operation.

Of course, I am not discounting ANY human loss. But as they say, "The needs of the many..."
 
not inflated, deflated.
 
Originally posted by kyleb
not inflated, deflated.

Well, I've been waiting on the Red Cross or some other legitimate organization to give an accurate number..you must have info others have yet to see. Care to share a link or reference?
 
  • #10
BTW, Alias, no one seems to be speculating about Iraqi military casualties... I've been looking. Just from direct reports (X many killed in battle Y) I'd personally guess the number is 10,000 minimum, probably far higher.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by damgo
But I don't know about classifying govt employees as "combatants"... since I work for a state university, that would make me a combatant, too, wouldn't it? Hmm.
No, AFAIK, state universities are only funded by the state, not run by it. Not sure though. Either way, they are not part of the command structure. Maybe I should qualify my statement: federal government employees.
not inflated, deflated.
You're not suggesting the Iraqis would UNDERstate the civilian casualty total, are you kyle?

damgo, I was thinking more on the order of 100,000-300,000 by now. Rumor has it we killed 250,000 in the first Gulf War.
 
  • #12
Originally posted by kat
Well, I've been waiting on the Red Cross or some other legitimate organization to give an accurate number..you must have info others have yet to see. Care to share a link or reference?

oh no kat sorry, i was just reffering to damgo comment about classifying govt employees as "combatants"; i have no clue what a honest total would be.
 
  • #13
Kyleb-Ah, ok, thanks.
 
Back
Top