Are many exercises in Schutz just too hard?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the perceived difficulty of exercises in Bernard F. Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity," particularly in the context of self-study. Participants share their experiences and concerns regarding the challenges posed by the exercises, some of which seem to extend beyond the material covered in the text.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about being unable to solve 20% of the exercises, suggesting that some may require knowledge not covered in the text, such as Killing fields.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of "just too hard," noting that different students struggle with different exercises based on their prior experience and skills.
  • A third participant suggests that successfully completing 80% of the exercises is acceptable for self-study, mentioning that it is common for textbooks to include challenging problems that most students cannot solve without assistance.
  • A later reply references a statement from Wald's book, indicating that the author believes the exercises are not inordinately difficult, though this is presented with a hint of humor regarding the author's confidence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the difficulty of the exercises. Some believe that the challenges are reasonable, while others feel that certain exercises may exceed the expectations set by the text.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the exercises may not align perfectly with the material presented in the text, and there is an acknowledgment of varying levels of prior knowledge among students.

epovo
Messages
114
Reaction score
21
Dear all,
I am self-studying GR using A First Course in General Relativity by Bernard F Schutz. I am halfway through the course, trying to solve all the exercises. But I worry that I can solve maybe 80% of them, the remaining 20% I find them just too hard.
I know I am no genius, and I don't have anyone to compare against. I would like to hear from people who have walked this path before.
Sometimes, the exercises seem to expand on topics that aren't covered in the text rather than being real exercises that the student is supposed to solve on their own.
As an example, without having mentioned Killing fields before in the text, an exercise defines the Killing equation as $$\nabla_\alpha \xi_\beta + \nabla_\beta \xi_\alpha = 0$$ and asks to prove that along a geodesic, ##p^\alpha \xi_\alpha## is constant.
I couldn't do this one. I am not asking for a proof, because I already found it elsewhere and I thought it very instructive. My question is rather whether most students can be expected to solve this exercise. If so, maybe I should work harder on my tensor algebra proficiency before going any further.
Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "just too hard" mean?
Everybody will struggle with some of the exercises - different students struggle with different ones according to their prior experience, skills, effort and talents.
I don't have anyone to compare against
Are you studying this by yourself?
The text is really intended to accompany a lecture course with other study material, assignments, tutors, and other students.
 
For self study, I suspect successfully doing 80% of the exercises is just fine. I do not have a copy of this book, but it is certainly common for authors to include a portion of exercises that most students cannot do unassisted. I know of texts that include problems that, if solved based on presented material, would indicate a possible Feynman. I even know of one text that includes some unsolved problems as exercises, and another that includes 2 problems that the author knows could not be solved (with a joke based on them: the second is introduced by "for those who solved problem xyz" that cannot be solved);.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Wald says, in the introduction of his book, that none of the exercises is inordinately difficult, then in parentheses "i.e., I think I can solve them".
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MathematicalPhysicist and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K