Are NFS Grants Affecting University Systems Support Budgets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PiratePhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grants
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
9 replies · 4K views
PiratePhysicist
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hey,
So I work the systems support for some university departments, and the amount of funding we get from one of the departments is in no way proportional to the amount of support we give them (they easily take up 3/5ths of our time and resources, but give maybe 1/4 of our funds). I've heard this is because there are rules about NFS grants that forbid money being spent on servicing equipment. Out of curiosity is this true? At all? Does anyone work at a university where the Systems support folks don't get screwed? How do they manage it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't believe grants are regulated by the government. You'd have to check your university policy on grants and funding if you want more information. Basically what I'm saying is, the university can do whatever they want with the money and it's not illegal. Best thing you can do is ask the person in charge of the grant and tell them that you and your coworkers don't feel compensated for the work you're doing. They might give you a raise.

Let me give you an example. Only the recent bailed out companies that received massive funds are regulated in terms of salaries and the regulation only refers to bonuses. Top CEOs are not allowed to give themselves large bonuses if they used public funds to prop up their company. However, your university doesn't qualify as a bailed out company. There lots of times the government overpays for products that they purchase but there is nothing you can do to stop it. Wasteful spending happens at all levels of government funded projects because it's not regulated. Have you been watching Fox news lately? You'll see a lot of wasteful spending examples if you watch Hannity on Fox news.

In summary, the person who got the grant from the government is in charge. You have to talk to him about it.Edit: The only aspect of a grant that is probably regulated is the part that you have to do what you say you claim to do. As in, if you say you're going to upgrade the computer systems at a university then you must do it. However, the federal government doesn't have a say in how much employees should earn off of the grant. That is left up to the person who got the grant.
 
Last edited:
Andy Resnick said:
What is an NFS grant?

I'm assuming it means grants for computer systems, Network File System. The OP said he works for system support services and he talked about upgrading systems at a university so that was my conclusion.
 
HallsofIvy has it right, turns out I'm a horrible typist and had spent much of earlier today ranting about NSF mounts being broken :)
 
PiratePhysicist said:
HallsofIvy has it right, turns out I'm a horrible typist and had spent much of earlier today ranting about NSF mounts being broken :)

Here's a good link. Turns out you can report fraud or wasted spending. I wouldn't be hasty to report if you didn't have proof though.

http://www.nsf.gov/oig/misconscieng.jsp




Here's a professor who's in trouble with the Feds.
http://www.ibtimes.com/blogs/articles/1149/20090226/uf-professor-samim-anghaie-and-wife-accused-of-defrauding-nasa.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PiratePhysicist said:
HallsofIvy has it right, turns out I'm a horrible typist and had spent much of earlier today ranting about NSF mounts being broken :)

There are many different flavors of NSF grants:

http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf09_29/index.jsp
http://www.nsf.gov/funding/preparing/types.jsp?org=NSF

In general, NSF does not provide 12-month salary support to the PI, nor does it provide funds for:
'NSF does not normally support technical assistance, pilot plant efforts, research requiring security classification, the development of products for commercial marketing, or market research for a particular project or invention. Research with disease-related goals, including ...'

Unfortunately, that's a very normal aspect of government-funded research. Honestly, as academia starts to apply "total cost accounting" (or whatever equivalent buzzword you choose), chairs, deans, and provosts are not able to shuffle around funds like they used to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really, I was reading things last night, and it would seem that maintenance of the equipment could fall under an indirect cost, or was I misreading?
 
Indirect costs are money I pay to my institution for the privilege of working on my research project- i.e., rent. Once upon a time, a fraction of that indirect cost was returned by the Dean to the Department, but that happens less and less as money dries up. The Dean gets the indirect to spend as she wishes.

maintenance of equipment that I use is considered a direct cost, and rightly so. Core facilities charge 'user fees' to cover maintenance (service contracts, consumables, techs, etc) costs.