Are normalization constants of wave equation time dependent?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of normalization constants in the context of the wave equation, particularly whether these constants are time-dependent. Participants explore implications for stationary and non-stationary states, as well as the role of the Schrödinger equation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that since the wave function solution is a function of time and position, the integral of its square over all space will generally yield a time-dependent function, implying that the normalization constant may also be time-dependent.
  • Another participant argues that probability conservation allows for a time factor of exp(iEt) in stationary states, which can be absorbed into the normalization constant.
  • A different viewpoint is presented, questioning the applicability of the time factor in cases where the wave equation is not separable, suggesting that normalization may not be straightforward in such scenarios.
  • One participant asserts that the unitarity of the Schrödinger equation preserves the vector length, indicating that normalization need only be performed once for time-independent Hamiltonians, as the evolution of the state can be described by a unitary transformation.
  • There is mention of a different approach for time-dependent Hamiltonians, though specifics are not elaborated upon in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the time-dependence of normalization constants, with some supporting the idea that they can be absorbed in certain cases, while others highlight complications in non-stationary scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general applicability of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the separability of the wave equation and the conditions under which normalization is considered. The discussion does not resolve the implications of time-dependent versus time-independent Hamiltonians.

singularity93
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The wave function solution psi is a function of time and position. Hence the integral of its square over all x will, in general, give a function of time. To normalize this, we must multiply with the inverse of the function. Therefore it seems that the normalization constant does not remain constant over all time. Please tell if my understanding is correct or whether I have made a mistake somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is that probability conservation in time forces stationary states into an exp (i Et) time factor which can be 'absorbed' into the normalization constant, if you please.
 
That the time is an exp(i Et) is true only in stationery states. What will happen when the wave equation isn't separable? It may not simply get absorbed while normalizing anymore.
 
The Schroedinger equation is unitary, so it will preserve the length of the vector, so normalizing once is enough.

Actually, this is the same as dextercioby's reply. For a time-independent Hamiltonian, the Schrödinger equation is something like |ψ(t)> = exp(iHt)|ψ(0)>, which is unitary. Because the Hamiltonian H is generates time evolution, one can expand the initial state in energy eigenstates, which will each then evolve with exp(iEt).

There's a slightly different formula for time-dependent Hamiltonians, but the idea is the same:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-...ng-2012/lecture-notes/MIT22_02S12_lec_ch6.pdf
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K