Are Photons Massless? | Inquiry & Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kurushimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless Photons
Kurushimi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is just a random inquiry that's confusing me. I remember hearing at one point that the reason no object could travel at the speed of light is that an object with mass going at the speed of light would require an infinite amount of energy to get moving that fast. And that photons could do it because they were massless. But, then, I also recall hearing that photons aren't truly massless...which seems contradictory to me. I can't remember my sources. Was I misinformed about one (or, perhaps both) of these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd like to know too. I'm on a desparete journy to understand the difference between energy (ei light) and matter-form energy.
 
Yes, to the best of our knowledge photons are exactly massless, which means they travel at c (which we refer to as "the speed of light" only because photons appear to be massless).

Any massive object will have a speed that is strictly less than c no matter how much energy it has.
 
There are two answers to this question. The theorist's answer is "yes, the photon is massless. Were it not, the elecric potential energy of a charged particle would vary like \frac{1}{r}e^{-m_\gamma r} instead of just \frac{1}{r}, among other effects." The experimentalist's answer is "probably. Our best measurements of the photon's mass are consistent with 0 and the upper bound they set is 15 or 16 orders of magnitude smaller than any other known mass."
 
Parlyne said:
The experimentalist's answer is "probably. Our best measurements of the photon's mass are consistent with 0 and the upper bound they set is 15 or 16 orders of magnitude smaller than any other known mass."
I would say this as "yes, to within experimental error".
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top