Are Photons Reflected Directly from Surfaces or Re-emitted by Atoms?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of photon reflection from surfaces, specifically whether photons are reflected directly or if they are absorbed and re-emitted by atoms in the reflecting surface. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to optics and solid-state physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether photons are reflected as is from a surface or if they are captured and re-emitted by atoms, noting that re-emission would typically lead to random directions.
  • Others suggest that reflection can be better understood through the wave nature of light, particularly in the context of diffraction gratings, which demonstrate that reflection involves interactions with the entire surface rather than individual atoms.
  • A participant argues that the same laws of quantum electrodynamics (QED) apply to both diffraction gratings and mirrors, implying a similarity in their reflection mechanisms.
  • Concerns are raised about the plausibility of the absorption and re-emission model explaining the angle of incidence equaling the angle of reflection, particularly in the context of metals versus dielectrics.
  • Some participants highlight the complexities of solid-state physics compared to atomic physics, noting the presence of energy bands in solids that complicate the understanding of reflection.
  • There is mention of specific characteristics of typical mirrors, including the angle of incidence equaling the angle of reflection and the phase shift of reflected light.
  • A participant acknowledges that while they had a prior understanding of the topic, the discussion has brought up various reflections and scenarios, including reflections from windows and asphalt.
  • Another participant points out that the discussion has shifted from a simple case of mirror reflection to more complex scenarios, emphasizing the need for clarity in the parameters being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of reflection, with no consensus reached on whether photons are reflected directly or through absorption and re-emission by atoms. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of reflection and the complexities introduced by different types of surfaces (e.g., mirrors vs. diffraction gratings) and materials (e.g., metals vs. dielectrics). The discussion also highlights the distinction between solid-state physics and atomic physics, which may affect interpretations of the phenomena.

JR Wakefield
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Simple question. Are photons reflected as is from a surface like a mirror, or is the reflecting surface atoms capturing the photons and re-emitting them?
 
Science news on Phys.org
JR Wakefield said:
Simple question. Are photons reflected as is from a surface like a mirror, or is the reflecting surface atoms capturing the photons and re-emitting them?
Certainly not capturing and re-emitting in the sense of electrons changing energy levels. In that process, the new direction would be random.
Reflection is more easily envisioned with the wave nature of light.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, davenn and gneill
JR Wakefield said:
Are photons reflected as is from a surface like a mirror, or is the reflecting surface atoms capturing the photons and re-emitting them?
There are surfaces called diffraction gratings. They can cause photons to reflect at an angle different from the angle of incidence. They are used to show that reflection is not an interaction of a photon with a single atom, but with the entire surface. The photon doesn’t just take one path and interact with the one atom at the apex of that one path. The photon takes all of the possible paths and interacts with all of the atoms in a way that cannot be identified with any single atom of the diffraction grating.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and FactChecker
Dale said:
There are surfaces called diffraction gratings. They can cause photons to reflect at an angle different from the angle of incidence. They are used to show that reflection is not an interaction of a photon with a single atom, but with the entire surface. The photon doesn’t just take one path and interact with the one atom at the apex of that one path. The photon takes all of the possible paths and interacts with all of the atoms in a way that cannot be identified with any single atom of the diffraction grating.
But how can we know that this is the same mechanism as reflection from a mirror?
 
haruspex said:
But how can we know that this is the same mechanism as reflection from a mirror?
A diffraction grating is just a mirror with blacked out stripes. The same laws of QED that describe the behavior of a diffraction grating also describe the behavior of a mirror without the black stripes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Dale said:
A diffraction grating is just a mirror with blacked out stripes.
Ok.
 
JR Wakefield said:
Simple question. Are photons reflected as is from a surface like a mirror, or is the reflecting surface atoms capturing the photons and re-emitting them?

It is always problematic if you take a solid, but then start to consider its behavior in terms of the individual atoms. This is why solid state physics is different than atomic physics. There are no energy bands in an atom, but there are such bands in a solid.

There are several things to consider in the typical specular reflection of visible light off a typical mirror:

1. Angle of incidence = angle of reflection

2. There is a π phase shift of the reflected light

3. The "reflector", i.e. the mirror, is typically a smooth metal surface. A dielectric does not make a very good mirror.

Here's what we know:

1. An atom that absorbs a photon and then re-emits it, typically will not re-emit in a specific direction. So accounting for "angle of incidence = angle of reflection" will be extremely difficult. So that explanation that it is due to surface atoms absorbing and re-emitting is not very plausible.

2. Metals have conduction electrons, as opposed to dielectric/insulator. They should play a role in this optical process (and they do).

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and sophiecentaur
Dale said:
A diffraction grating is just a mirror with blacked out stripes.
Or a mirror with a “sawtooth” profile.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Thanks to all for replying. I already knew the answer. But simple things like your reflection in a window, or the road reflection off the asphalt at very low angles, and even prisms, shows photons bounce off surfaces.
 
  • #10
JR Wakefield said:
the road reflection off the asphalt at very low angles
Are you referring to the mirage produced by the thermal gradient of the air?
 
  • #11
JR Wakefield said:
Thanks to all for replying. I already knew the answer. But simple things like your reflection in a window, or the road reflection off the asphalt at very low angles, and even prisms, shows photons bounce off surfaces.

You started off by asking for a smple reflection off a mirror! Now you're changing the parameters.

I didn't say that ALL types of reflection are governed by the same process. The case for Bragg reflection off crystal lattice planes has already been mentioned. You asked for a specific case, you got a specific answer relevant to that case. It was not meant to be used where it doesn't apply.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daemon9 and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K